-
-
March 29, 2023 at 6:36 amMilne AndoSubscriber
G'day,
I want to use Coupled scheme to calculate this case and therefore need to setup a suitable CFL number (Courant number). I've read the theory guide and the user guide, but its statement isn't clear to me. The CFL number in this scheme isn't used to calculate adptive time step size, a relaxation factor instead. As the pic shows its reciprocal is used as a relaxation factor, and the statement suggests thatÂ
If ANSYS Fluent immediately diverges in the AMG solver, then the CFL number is too high and should be reduced. Reducing the CFL number below 10 is not recommended since......In most transient cases, the CFL number should be set to a large value such as 10^7 and explicit relaxation factors to 1.0.
Well, 10≤ CFL ≤10^7 is such a wide range, so what value is good to start with?
-
March 29, 2023 at 12:37 pmRobForum Moderator
Default is 200, which can be a little optimistic. 2,000 is not going to go well in most cases. For transient solutions it's more common to use PISO, the benefits of PBCS are seen in steady cases.Â
-
- The topic ‘Recommended CFL number for low-Re turbulent flow (3D VIV simulation)’ is closed to new replies.
- Non-Intersected faces found for matching interface periodic-walls
- Script error Code: 800a000d
- Unburnt Hydrocarbons contour in ANSYS FORTE for sector mesh
- Help: About the expression of turbulent viscosity in Realizable k-e model
- Fluent fails with Intel MPI protocol on 2 nodes
- Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM
- error udf
- Diesel with Ammonia/Hydrogen blend combustion
- Mass Conservation Issue in Methane Pyrolysis Shock Tube Simulation
- Script Error
-
1341
-
591
-
579
-
525
-
366
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.