-
-
September 27, 2024 at 8:53 pmzoelle.wongSubscriber
I have experience with creating a periodic boundary conidtions, but I've never seen this issue before: Non-Intersected faces found for matching interface periodic-walls! Please improve the alignment of interface zones!
The off-set was automatically set; how can I check the off-set for my current setup? The walls that I'm specifying as periodic are in the second screenshot below. Thank you!
Â
-
October 1, 2024 at 12:18 pmRobForum Moderator
Check what's set in Mesh Interfaces and also under Periodic in the Boundary Conditions menu.Â
-
October 7, 2024 at 3:46 pmzoelle.wongSubscriber
I used the "auto" off set and ANSYS automatically computed -5deg. What can I do in the mesh to improve the offset?
-
October 7, 2024 at 4:05 pmRobForum Moderator
5 degrees? Can you confirm as the image looks a little larger than that.Â
-
October 7, 2024 at 7:32 pm
-
October 8, 2024 at 8:46 amRobForum Moderator
That's right, but the angle looks closer to 90 degrees.Â
-
October 8, 2024 at 2:49 pmzoelle.wongSubscriber
ah i see- the angle between the two faces are 90deg. should i change the mesh such that the angle between the two faces is 180deg?
-
October 8, 2024 at 2:59 pmRobForum Moderator
No, 90 degrees is generally a good angle - you've reduced the cell count but not created a sharp angle at the axis. It's the right choice in many cases.... The solver is usually very good at the calculation. Can you set the fluid rotation reference (axis) to x (default is z) and recalculate? I'm wondering if that's an issue.Â
-
October 8, 2024 at 3:07 pmzoelle.wongSubscriber
For the solver, i set it to be an auto conformal, origin at (0,0,0), axis of rotation (1,0,0,), and the auto-offset was calculated as -5deg. I think the offset might be too large; I did manuall decrease the offset at different angles less than 5deg but then the periodic BC wasn't builtÂ
-
October 8, 2024 at 3:15 pmRobForum Moderator
The offset should be equal to the angle between the two periodic boundaries.Â
-
October 8, 2024 at 4:29 pmzoelle.wongSubscriber
thank you that worked! changing the offset to 90deg fixed the issue. lastly- how can i check the periodic BCs are being enforced correctly? there's a way for me to "mirror" the blocks but would that be showing the mirrored BCs or projecting the flow field results as a mirror image?Â
-
October 9, 2024 at 8:48 amRobForum Moderator
Don't mirror, use Periodic Instancing from the ribbon. Display tab. It's changed since I last looked at the function too.Â
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
- How do you approach this?
- Convective Augmentation Factor in DEFINE_HEAT_FLUX
- Conservation issue with a UDS solution
- Non-Premixed Combustion PDF generation with 4th-order interpolation
- Where is the Electrolyte Projected Area in the Reports tab of PEMFC Model?
- ANSYS fluent – Rocky DEM coupling
- Solar load , Mesh Orientation and Beam direction
-
461
-
230
-
200
-
183
-
162
© 2024 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.