TAGGED: #fluent-#cfd-#ansys
-
-
September 12, 2025 at 6:06 am
jh.kim01
SubscriberI am currently working on an axial turbine simulation in Ansys Fluent and attempting to compare results between the pressure-based and density-based solvers.
Using the pressure-based solver, the case runs smoothly and converges without issue. However, when I switch to the density-based solver using the same case setup, the solution consistently diverges during the solve process.
Is there a known limitation or recommended approach when using the density-based solver for turbomachinery applications such as axial turbines? Could you advise whether Fluent supports density-based solver for this type of simulation, and if so, what adjustments might be necessary to ensure stability?
Thank you in advance for your assistance.
-
September 15, 2025 at 8:02 am
Essence
Ansys EmployeeHello,
Do you have any high pressure regions in your domain to use the density based solver? May I know the specific reason for switching to DBNS?
Thank you.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
- Varying Bond model parameters to mimic soil particle cohesion/stiction
- Issue to compile a UDF in ANSYS Fluent
- JACOBI Convergence Issue in ANSYS AQWA
- affinity not set
- Resuming SAG Mill Simulation with New Particle Batch in Rocky
- Continuing SAG Mill Simulation with New Particle Batch in Rocky
- Is it able to solve turbomachinery using density-based solver in Fluent?
- Two-way FSI simulation
- Ensight Force_per_unit area_EV
- Question about generating Porous Jumps
-
4562
-
1494
-
1386
-
1209
-
1021
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.