-
-
July 22, 2024 at 8:10 pmZwernjaydenSubscriber
What is the difference? And which should I use for a traditional rocket injector
-
July 23, 2024 at 8:58 amRobForum Moderator
One adds the particles from the surface facets and you define the releases diameter(s) the other uses a built in model to determine diameter distribution. They're all explained in the User's Guide under DPM Injections (Initial conditions).Â
As rockets have many "best" designs I can't really comment on that. You know what you're modelling, so what best suits your application?Â
-
July 23, 2024 at 4:14 pmZwernjaydenSubscriber
I'm going to assume plain oriface then because I am more concerned about uniform mixing and combustion. If my fuel and oxidizer are both injected using dpm, do I need a traditional pressure or mass flow inlet? Or does the injection take its place?
-
-
July 24, 2024 at 12:30 pmRobForum Moderator
The injection will add the material. You'll just need to evaporate the droplets to have combustion so initial conditions will need selecting with more care.Â
-
- The topic ‘Surface injection vs plain orifice atomizer’ is closed to new replies.
- Non-Intersected faces found for matching interface periodic-walls
- Unburnt Hydrocarbons contour in ANSYS FORTE for sector mesh
- Help: About the expression of turbulent viscosity in Realizable k-e model
- Script error Code: 800a000d
- Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM
- Fluent fails with Intel MPI protocol on 2 nodes
- error udf
- Diesel with Ammonia/Hydrogen blend combustion
- Mass Conservation Issue in Methane Pyrolysis Shock Tube Simulation
- Script Error
-
1241
-
543
-
523
-
225
-
209
© 2024 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.