-
-
July 22, 2024 at 8:10 pm
Zwernjayden
SubscriberWhat is the difference? And which should I use for a traditional rocket injector
-
July 23, 2024 at 8:58 am
Rob
Forum ModeratorOne adds the particles from the surface facets and you define the releases diameter(s) the other uses a built in model to determine diameter distribution. They're all explained in the User's Guide under DPM Injections (Initial conditions).Â
As rockets have many "best" designs I can't really comment on that. You know what you're modelling, so what best suits your application?Â
-
July 23, 2024 at 4:14 pm
Zwernjayden
SubscriberI'm going to assume plain oriface then because I am more concerned about uniform mixing and combustion. If my fuel and oxidizer are both injected using dpm, do I need a traditional pressure or mass flow inlet? Or does the injection take its place?
-
-
July 24, 2024 at 12:30 pm
Rob
Forum ModeratorThe injection will add the material. You'll just need to evaporate the droplets to have combustion so initial conditions will need selecting with more care.Â
-
- The topic ‘Surface injection vs plain orifice atomizer’ is closed to new replies.
- How do I get my hands on Ansys Rocky DEM
- Unburnt Hydrocarbons contour in ANSYS FORTE for sector mesh
- convergence issue for transonic flow
- Facing trouble regarding setting up boundary conditions for SOEC Modeling
- Point exception in erosion calculation
- Errors with multi-connected bodies using AQWA
- Script Error Ansys
-
2532
-
933
-
772
-
599
-
591
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.