-
-
July 22, 2024 at 8:10 pm
Zwernjayden
SubscriberWhat is the difference? And which should I use for a traditional rocket injector
-
July 23, 2024 at 8:58 am
Rob
Forum ModeratorOne adds the particles from the surface facets and you define the releases diameter(s) the other uses a built in model to determine diameter distribution. They're all explained in the User's Guide under DPM Injections (Initial conditions).Â
As rockets have many "best" designs I can't really comment on that. You know what you're modelling, so what best suits your application?Â
-
July 23, 2024 at 4:14 pm
Zwernjayden
SubscriberI'm going to assume plain oriface then because I am more concerned about uniform mixing and combustion. If my fuel and oxidizer are both injected using dpm, do I need a traditional pressure or mass flow inlet? Or does the injection take its place?
-
-
July 24, 2024 at 12:30 pm
Rob
Forum ModeratorThe injection will add the material. You'll just need to evaporate the droplets to have combustion so initial conditions will need selecting with more care.Â
-
- The topic ‘Surface injection vs plain orifice atomizer’ is closed to new replies.
- air flow in and out of computer case
- Varying Bond model parameters to mimic soil particle cohesion/stiction
- Eroded Mass due to Erosion of Soil Particles by Fluids
- I am doing a corona simulation. But particles are not spreading.
- Guidance needed for Conjugate Heat Transfer Analysis for a 3s3p Li-ion Battery
- Centrifugal Fan Analysis for Determination of Characteristic Curve
- Issue to compile a UDF in ANSYS Fluent
- JACOBI Convergence Issue in ANSYS AQWA
- affinity not set
- Resuming SAG Mill Simulation with New Particle Batch in Rocky
-
3892
-
1414
-
1241
-
1118
-
1015
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.