-
-
June 5, 2024 at 2:05 am
-
June 5, 2024 at 2:38 pmAlex R.Ansys Employee
Hello,Â
For some reason the line 99 is treated as a part of the *BOUNDARY_PRESRIBED_MOTION_SET_SEGMENT_ID from the line 90. Could you open the model in LS-PP and verify if all *BOUNDARY cards are property formatted?
Please let me know how it goes.
Alex
-
June 5, 2024 at 5:04 pmjavat33489Subscriber
Everything is fine there sir.
I noticed this strange thing. If I manually remove the SPC card from the k-file and add an empty line after MOTION_SET then the calculation works.
But this is a fatigue analysis based on a calculation that has already been carried out. And if this is not an analysis for fatigue, then there will be no fastening and the part will fly away.
-
-
Viewing 1 reply thread
- The topic ‘Problem after switching to 2024P1’ is closed to new replies.
Ansys Innovation Space
Trending discussions
- LS-DYNA Installation Issues with Student Workbench 2024 R2
- LS-Dyna CESE SMP d vs MPP d solver
- CESE solver – Ignition mechanism
- CONTROL_REFERENCE_CONFIGURATION
- Tiebreak using Segment set for contact b/w 20 noded Hexahedral elements
- Mathematical model generation stuck at 10%
- shape memory alloy material in LS-DYNA
- About combine different unconnected body into one part
- CESE combustion model
- Cross-coupled stiffness elements in LS-DYNA
Top Contributors
-
1181
-
488
-
487
-
225
-
201
Top Rated Tags
© 2024 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.