TAGGED: lsdyna
-
-
April 13, 2026 at 5:25 pm
kanteti-vsr
SubscriberHi all,Â
I’m running an LS-DYNA analysis in Ansys (Explicit Dynamics) with a 2D plane strain model, and I’m having an issue with time sampling of results.Â
I defined my output using a constant time interval (≈ 1e-7 s) expecting uniform time steps in the results. However, when I probe results in Ansys Mechanical (Velocity Probe → Tabular Data), the time values are not exact multiples of 1e-7. For example:Â
0Â
9.77E-08Â
1.95E-07Â
2.93E-07Â
3.91E-07Â
...ÂSo instead of getting exactly 1.00E-07, 2.00E-07, etc., I get slightly shifted values. Because of this, when I try to evaluate results at a specific time, Mechanical returns the nearest available value, not the exact time I want.Â
My understanding is that this may be related to LS-DYNA’s variable explicit time step, but I expected the output control to enforce exact time-based sampling.Â
Is there a way to force truly uniform time output (exact times)?Â
-
April 13, 2026 at 7:27 pm
Nanda
Ansys EmployeeHow do you want to control the timestep exactly? Can you elaborate this statement: "I defined my output using a constant time interval (≈ 1e-7 s) expecting uniform time steps in the results."
Regards,
Nanda.
Have a look at our public help documentation website: Ansys Help
For more exciting courses and certifications, hit this link: Ansys Innovation Courses | ANSYS Innovation Space
Guidelines for Posting on Ansys Learning Forum
Â
-
April 14, 2026 at 4:27 pm
kanteti-vsr
SubscriberHi Nanda,
Thanks for your follow-up. Let me clarify further and I’m attaching screenshots for reference.
In my current setup, I’ve defined the output time interval in Output Controls as Δt = 1e-7 s (see attached). My expectation was that the solver would write results at exact, uniform time increments based on this value.
However, when I check the results in Mechanical (Velocity Probe → Tabular Data), I see that the time values are not exact multiples of 1e-7. For example (also shown in the screenshot):
0
9.77E-08
1.95E-07
2.93E-07
3.91E-07
…So the spacing is approximately 1e-7, but not exact.
What I’m trying to achieve is strictly uniform output time steps, i.e., I would like the results to be written exactly at:
0, 1.00E-07, 2.00E-07, 3.00E-07, …
and continue like this consistently until the end time is reached, without these small deviations.
-
-
April 14, 2026 at 8:03 pm
Nanda
Ansys EmployeeDoes using the double precision solver help? This setting can be found under analysis settings named as "solver precision".
Â
-
April 14, 2026 at 8:10 pm
-
April 16, 2026 at 3:52 am
Dennis Chen
SubscriberCan I just say? Check the input deck and look at what was written out...forget about the GUI.  it is like putting a layer of flour skin over another dumpling while what you care about is the filling... it is ridiculous...
it is very simple to check the right database card is writing out data at the right interval instead of looking at it under the cover of workbench. Â
-
April 16, 2026 at 10:53 am
Nanda
Ansys EmployeeI agree with Dennis chen, write the input file from WB and see what it has. I would also turn off the default control cards by WB and see if it changes anything in the output.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
-
6259
-
1906
-
1457
-
1308
-
1022
© 2026 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.


