-
-
May 17, 2024 at 9:02 am
shuo wang
Subscriber -
May 17, 2024 at 10:03 am
Rob
Forum ModeratorThe gradient will be a function of the flow, why do you need the Adjoint solver too?
-
May 23, 2024 at 3:30 pm
shuo wang
SubscriberSorry, I didn't explain the background of this issue clearly. My purpose is to invert the actual emission intensity. For example, in an industrial park, a company claims to have a daily emission of 1t/d, but in reality, it may be far more than that. By using real observation data, establish a cost function for the difference between simulated and measured values, and by minimizing the cost function, deduce the actual emission rate.That's why I need a gradient based adjoint solver.
-
-
May 31, 2024 at 9:13 am
Rob
Forum ModeratorThat may be better done with a few simulations and then look for a pattern or link. It's going to be very nonlinear so setting criteria might be more difficult.
-
- The topic ‘Fluent Adjoint solver is only capable of shape optimization?’ is closed to new replies.
- JACOBI Convergence Issue in ANSYS AQWA
- Is it able to solve turbomachinery using density-based solver in Fluent?
- Two-way FSI simulation
- Ensight Force_per_unit area_EV
- RIBBON WINDOW DISAPPEARED
- Fluent Meshing Error when .dsco not .stp
- Ansys Fluent for modelling Ocean Wave reactions to Wave Barriers
- Battery Pack cooling
- ISAT ABORT error
- UNASSIGNED INTERFACE ZONE DETECTED FOR INTERFACE…
-
4597
-
1495
-
1386
-
1209
-
1021
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
