-
-
May 17, 2024 at 9:02 amshuo wangSubscriber
-
May 17, 2024 at 10:03 amRobForum Moderator
The gradient will be a function of the flow, why do you need the Adjoint solver too?
-
May 23, 2024 at 3:30 pmshuo wangSubscriber
Sorry, I didn't explain the background of this issue clearly. My purpose is to invert the actual emission intensity. For example, in an industrial park, a company claims to have a daily emission of 1t/d, but in reality, it may be far more than that. By using real observation data, establish a cost function for the difference between simulated and measured values, and by minimizing the cost function, deduce the actual emission rate.That's why I need a gradient based adjoint solver.
-
-
May 31, 2024 at 9:13 amRobForum Moderator
That may be better done with a few simulations and then look for a pattern or link. It's going to be very nonlinear so setting criteria might be more difficult.
-
- The topic ‘Fluent Adjoint solver is only capable of shape optimization?’ is closed to new replies.
- error udf
- Help: About the expression of turbulent viscosity in Realizable k-e model
- Unburnt Hydrocarbons contour in ANSYS FORTE for sector mesh
- Fluent fails with Intel MPI protocol on 2 nodes
- Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM
- Diesel with Ammonia/Hydrogen blend combustion
- Non-Intersected faces found for matching interface periodic-walls
- Mass Conservation Issue in Methane Pyrolysis Shock Tube Simulation
- Encountering Error in Heterogeneous Surface Reaction
- How to obtain axial and tangential velocity in CFX-post?
-
1131
-
468
-
466
-
225
-
201
© 2024 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.