LS Dyna

LS Dyna

Topics related to LS-DYNA, Autodyn, Explicit STR and more.

Contact defined but zero reaction force/stress (AUTOMATIC_SURFACE_TO_SURFACE)

TAGGED: 

    • zmohamma
      Subscriber

      I am simulating a very simple model in LS-DYNA:

      Slave: a sample modeled with Shell_Beta elements

      Master: a steel plate, modeled first with solid elements and then also tested with shell elements

      Contact: *CONTACT_AUTOMATIC_SURFACE_TO_SURFACE with both SSTYP=0 and MSTYP=0 (segment option)

      Friction: static = 0.30, dynamic = 0.23

      Penetration check: 0 mm (initially)

      Both versions (shell–solid and shell–shell) run without any errors. However, the results are not what I expect:

      Reaction force = 0 N

      No change in stress or strain in either part

      It seems as if the contact card is not working at all

      What I tried:

      Changing the plate from solid to shell

      Verifying that the segment option is active

      Checking for initial penetration (none)

      Ensuring friction coefficients are correctly defined

      Problem: Despite these checks, the contact appears to never activate, and output quantities (reaction force, stresses) remain zero.

      Question:
      Do you have any suggestions on what I might be missing? In particular:

      Are there special settings needed for shell thickness in segment-based contacts?

      Could the lack of a normal load be preventing frictional contact forces from appearing?

      Any other contact-control parameters I should enable to make sure the surfaces “see” each other?

      Any advice would be appreciated!

    • Satvik
      Ansys Employee

      Hello User,

      I'm checking with this. I'll get back to you with my comments shortly!

      Regards,

      Satvik.

      Introducing Ansys Assistant a 24/7 AI-powered virtual assistant for active Ansys academic customers.

      Have a look at our public help documentation website: Ansys Help

      For more exciting courses and certifications, hit this link: Ansys Innovation Courses | ANSYS Innovation Space

      Guidelines for Posting on Ansys Learning Forum

    • Satvik
      Ansys Employee

      Hi User,

      As mentioned earlier, the run terminated without any errors. To proceed effectively, could you please confirm the following details:

      1. Contact Visualization:
        During post-processing, do you observe actual contact between the master and slave surfaces? Or is there a noticeable gap between them?

      2. Part Details:

        • What are the thicknesses of both parts involved?
        • What element formulation (ELFORM) is being used for each?
      3. Loading Conditions:

        • What type of load is being applied?
        • What is its magnitude?

      Meanwhile, here are a few suggestions you can try:

      • Change the SOFT parameter to SOFT=1 or SOFT=2.
      • A commonly used reference setup in the automotive industry is:
        *CONTACT_AUTOMATIC_SURFACE_TO_SURFACE with
        SOFT=2SBOPT=3DEPTH=35, and PSTIFF=1.
        This can be a good starting point.
      • If the impact speed is high and the timestep is large, contact may not be detected. Try reducing the timestep.
      • Experiment with different SSTYP/MSTYP values:
        • First iteration: SSTYP=2MSTYP=2 (Part Set ID)
        • Second iteration: SSTYP=3MSTYP=3 (Part ID)
      • Try switching the contact type to *CONTACT_AUTOMATIC_SINGLE_SURFACE.

      Let me know once you’ve reviewed the above points or if you need help implementing any of the suggestions.

      Best regards,
      Satvik Koli
      Technical Support Engineer

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.