Ansys Assistant will be unavailable on the Learning Forum starting January 30. An upgraded version is coming soon. We apologize for any inconvenience and appreciate your patience. Stay tuned for updates.
LS Dyna

LS Dyna

Topics related to LS-DYNA, Autodyn, Explicit STR and more.

RC blast door SALE simulation: deflection trend matches literature but peak disp

    • n66134267
      Subscriber

      When simulating an RC blast door using SALE (ALE–FSI) in LS-DYNA,

      the time-history trend of the door deflection matches the literature, but the peak displacement is significantly smaller.Dark red: simulation result (this study) Light red: literature result

       Peak deflection
      Literature3.47 mm
      My model< 2.0 mm

      So the response shape is correct, but the amplitude is underestimated.


      Model summary

      Geometry

      • RC door thickness: 100 mm

      • Door location: z = 0–0.1 m

      • ALE domain: z = -0.6–3.4 m

      • Door rear surface initially touching the frame


      Explosive

      • TNT: 0.15 kg

      • Half model with symmetry plane at x = 0


      ALE mesh

      10 mm
       

      Concrete

      MAT_072R3 (KCC)
      f'c ≈ 19.7 MPa
       

      Reinforcement

       
      MAT_PLASTIC_KINEMATIC
      E = 200 GPa
      ETAN = 1e9 Pa

      Embedded using: CONSTRAINED_BEAM_IN_SOLID_PENALTY


      Solid elements

      ELFORM = 1
       

      FSI coupling

       
      ALE_STRUCTURED_FSI
      LSTRSID = 1
      (part set includes parts 1,2,3,4,5,11)
      PFAC = 1
      FLIP = 0
       

      Contact

      Door–frame interaction:

       
      CONTACT_AUTOMATIC_SURFACE_TO_SURFACE
       

      Frame is located behind the door and initially touching the door rear surface.

      Friction:

      FS = 0.2
      FD = 0.15
       

      Tests already performed

      ALE backside domain

       
      z = -0.6 → -0.3
       

      No noticeable effect.


      Beam–solid coupling parameters

      Adjusted penalty parameters → no noticeable effect


      Frame-wall connection

      Removing shared nodes → response trend became worse


      Question

      In ALE–FSI blast simulations, when:

      • pressure history appears reasonable

      • displacement time-history trend matches literature

      • but peak displacement is underestimated

      what are the most common causes?

      In particular, I would like to ask:

      Could the door–frame initial contact (rear surface initially touching the frame) act as an early support condition and reduce the door bending deformation?

      Any suggestions or similar experiences would be greatly appreciated.

    • Nanda
      Ansys Employee

      Hello User,

      Ansys employees are not authorised to assist with this query. Let's wait for other forum contributors to chime in.

      Regards,

      Nanda.

      Introducing Ansys Assistant a 24/7 AI-powered virtual assistant for active Ansys academic customers.

      Have a look at our public help documentation website: Ansys Help

      For more exciting courses and certifications, hit this link: Ansys Innovation Courses | ANSYS Innovation Space

      Guidelines for Posting on Ansys Learning Forum

    • ErKo
      Ansys Employee

       

      Hi

      Perhaps DChen has some feedback?

      Alsos perhaps contact the authors of this paper (Dynamic response of blast doors enhanced by enclosed-space...) to get more info on the FE model they did.

      All the best

      Erko

       

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
[bingo_chatbox]