-
-
May 23, 2024 at 10:27 pmJunaid IqbalSubscriber
Hi everyone i am doing CFD Analysis of the Propeller whose dia is 76 inch i have calculated the tip velocity while ignoring any assumptions, tip speed is 0.80 Mach, Now i have use Fluent Module and choosed Pressure based solver results are validating as i did found thrust through another software that computes thrust in 2D. In Pressure based solver thrust is around 600 N less than that of 2D Analysis that is obviously because of prandtl Tip/lift losses factor and another 3D losses. Now my question was that can we use Pressure based solver for rotating bodies where some of the part of the lies in transonic regime while most part of the body lies in mild compressible regime.
-
May 27, 2024 at 6:34 amSameer KulkarniAnsys Employee
Hello,
You can try using DBNS and verify the results.
-
- The topic ‘pressure vs density based solvers in rotating flows’ is closed to new replies.
- Non-Intersected faces found for matching interface periodic-walls
- Unburnt Hydrocarbons contour in ANSYS FORTE for sector mesh
- Fluent fails with Intel MPI protocol on 2 nodes
- Help: About the expression of turbulent viscosity in Realizable k-e model
- Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM
- error udf
- Mass Conservation Issue in Methane Pyrolysis Shock Tube Simulation
- Script Error
- Facing trouble regarding setting up boundary conditions for SOEC Modeling
- UDF, Fluent: Access count of iterations for “Steady Statistics”
-
1416
-
599
-
591
-
565
-
366
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.