TAGGED: design-optimization, designpoints, drag-coefficient, fluent, workbench
-
-
April 22, 2022 at 3:26 pmwrosendoengSubscriber
Hi,
I'm studying an inviscid compressible flow that I tried to analyze with two different manners:
- Creating a new Fluent Analysis for each case (12 velocities, from Mach 1 to Mach 3)
- Using Design Points and defining input/output parameters and solving these 12 velocities.
When I compared both results with my reference values for drag coefficient (CD), the first case presents far better results than second one. Is there any explanation?
Thanks in advance!
April 25, 2022 at 3:40 pmRobForum ModeratorWhat is the initial condition and convergence level for each case?
April 25, 2022 at 7:35 pmAmine Ben Hadj AliAnsys EmployeeUsually convergence and startup related.
Viewing 2 reply threads- The topic ‘Same model, different results’ is closed to new replies.
Ansys Innovation SpaceTrending discussions- Non-Intersected faces found for matching interface periodic-walls
- Unburnt Hydrocarbons contour in ANSYS FORTE for sector mesh
- Fluent fails with Intel MPI protocol on 2 nodes
- Help: About the expression of turbulent viscosity in Realizable k-e model
- Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM
- error udf
- Mass Conservation Issue in Methane Pyrolysis Shock Tube Simulation
- Script Error
- Facing trouble regarding setting up boundary conditions for SOEC Modeling
- UDF, Fluent: Access count of iterations for “Steady Statistics”
Top Contributors-
1416
-
599
-
591
-
565
-
366
Top Rated Tags© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.
-