The Ansys Innovation Space website recently experienced a database corruption issue. While service has been restored there appears to have been some data loss from November 13. We are still investigating and apologize for any issues our users may have as a result.
Legacy Products

Legacy Products

Discovery AIM tutorial – 3D Finite-Element Analysis of a Bike Crank

    • Watch & LearnWatch & Learn
      Participant

      This example is taken from Cornell University’s ANSYS AIM Learning Modules



      In this tutorial, you will learn to:

      • Determine the displacements and stresses in a bike crank using 3D FEA capabilities in Discovery AIM
      • Verify the finite-element results from Discovery AIM by refining the mesh and also comparing with hand calculations

      Consider the following bike crank model.

       width=

      To orient ourselves, the following figure shows the location of a similar bike crank mounted on a bicycle.

       width=

      Material properties: The bicycle crank’s material is Aluminum 6061-t6. The Young’s modulus is 10,000 ksi, and the Poisson’s Ratio is .33.

      Boundary conditions: Apply a load of 100 lbf in the y-direction on the right hole surface and fix the 3 left hole surfaces as shown below. Note that this is an approximation of the actual loads and constraints on the bike crank.

       width=

      Using Discovery AIM, determine the following:

      • Deformed shape and displacement field
      • Stress distribution

      In the pre-analysis step, we review the:

      • Mathematical model
      • Numerical solution strategy
      • Hand calculations of expected results


      The geometry has been created in SolidWorks and saved as a Parasolid file.  Download the Parasolid file.

      The following video shows you how to navigate Discovery AIM and import the Parasolid file.


      The video below demonstrates the steps to mesh the geometry using Hexahedral elements which look like boxes. Hexahedral (or hex) elements yield higher accuracy compared with the default tetrahedral (or tet) elements for the same number of nodes.


      We need to create a new material and assign it to the model as shown in the following video. Otherwise, ANSYS will use the Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio for structural steel which is the default. This step is easy to overlook.  Next, we apply the boundary conditions i.e. displacement constraints at the 3 left holes and traction on part of the right hole. Boundary surfaces where we neither apply a displacement constraint nor traction are assumed by ANSYS to be free surfaces with zero traction.

      Summary of steps in above video:

      • Change the material from default to a newly created material
      • Change the properties of the new material to those of AL 6061-T6 in the problem description
      • Create a fixed support at the three holes
      • Create a force acting on the inside facing circular hole
      • Specify the y-component to be 100lbf
      • Solve the physics

      The following video shows how to plot the deformed shape and use it to check if the displacement constraints have been applied correctly.  We next take a look at variation in stress in X-dir in the model. We interrogate variation in stress in X-dir in the interior of the model using a plane.

      Summary of steps in above video:

      • Evaluate the 2 pre-defined results – equivalent stress and displacement magnitude
      • View deformation of the crank
      • Create a new contour to view normal stress in X direction
      • Create a new plane along cross-section of crank and create a new contour to view the stress variation along cross section
      • Create a force reaction result to check force balance

      • Check that the solution agrees with the mathematical model
        • Are the boundary conditions on displacement and traction satisfied?
        • Is equilibrium satisfied?
          • Do the reaction forces balance the applied load?
      • Check that the numerical error is acceptable
        • Are the ANSYS results reasonably independent of the mesh?
          • We can refine the mesh by reducing the Size Controls and updating the solution.  We can then compare the results to the original mesh.
      • Compare with hand calculations for the bending stress and maximum displacement