TAGGED: drop-test-simulation, impact-analysis
-
-
December 30, 2023 at 6:36 amRo.hiSubscriber
Explicit dynamic analysis or Transient Analysis?
-
December 30, 2023 at 7:05 pmpeteroznewmanSubscriber
Depends on how much self contact will be present. If just a few surfaces need to be put in a contact definition, then Transient Analysis may be superior. If a large number of surfaces will deform and create self contact, Explicit Dynamics automatically detects self contact so you don't have to predict where the contact will occur. For example, if the item has a hard external shell and the product will bounce off the floor, then Transient Analysis would work well. If the item has a crushable zone, then Explicit Dynamics would be better because automatic element erosion can allow crushing of material in the crush/crumple zone.
-
January 10, 2024 at 6:04 amRo.hiSubscriber
Oh ok, Sir
Thanking You for reply....
-
- The topic ‘Which one best for drop test(impact test)?’ is closed to new replies.
- LS-DYNA Installation Issues with Student Workbench 2024 R2
- Cross-coupled stiffness elements in LS-DYNA
- Initial Stress Shell Application and HistVarCosine in LS-DYNA
- shape memory alloy material in LS-DYNA
- Initial Velocity Generation
- MAT072R3- concrete damage rel3 validation
- *** Error 40058 (SOL+58) retractor 1000002:convergence failure at time1.01E+02
- Mohr_Coulomb material model (MAT_173)
- LS-Dyna, Negative volume problem.
- Fluid-structure interaction coupling
-
1882
-
802
-
599
-
591
-
366
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.