-
-
April 16, 2019 at 7:49 pm
sooraj546
SubscriberSuppose in a single phase problem..... some reaction are happening and the products produced needs to diffuse out through the outer wall........
Generally in any case when we need a mass transfer across a wall when species transport is enabled....... there is an option under wall boundary condition - species- specify mass fraction or zero diffusing flux etc
For eg if I specify 0 for a particular species A their then that means outside the wall A overall mass fraction is 0 and diffusion will happen from higher to lower concentration rt ! But my question is what is the rate at which this transport will happen ........ how does fluent determines the mass transfer coefficient for this scenario ? -
April 17, 2019 at 4:20 am
DrAmine
Ansys EmployeeThere is no membrane like BC for species in Fluent. You need to write UDFs. -
April 17, 2019 at 9:42 am
DrAmine
Ansys EmployeeLooks okay but please refer to the customization manual.
-
April 17, 2019 at 11:22 am
Rob
Forum ModeratorYou should just need to alter the above example to suit the maths and use the source in the species equation. Remember to also remove the same amount of material as a mass sink too. Assuming "conc_co" is a species concentration, you'll need to find that macro too.Â
-
April 17, 2019 at 11:34 am
sooraj546
SubscriberThanks alot for that reply as well sir,
I am just asking if the representation in the DEFINE_SOURCE
source = C_UDMI(F_C0(c,t),THREAD_T0(t),0);
IS THIS CORRECT?
-
April 17, 2019 at 12:46 pm
DrAmine
Ansys EmployeeHow did you get that document from technical team?
-
April 17, 2019 at 12:57 pm
sooraj546
SubscriberA friend who is working in in ANSYS forwarded me this AS help...................could you kindly help me out with my doubt sir as its not working
Â
I am just asking if the representation in the DEFINE_SOURCE
source = C_UDMI(F_C0(c,t),THREAD_T0(t),0);
IS THIS CORRECT?
-
April 18, 2019 at 4:08 am
DrAmine
Ansys EmployeeNo it is not correct. Just use what in the document.Â
-
April 21, 2019 at 6:39 am
sooraj546
Subscriberwhen i add the adjust function its working and displaying msg UDF done etc but when i add the source term..........its hows the error as shown below.
I cant resolve it. Kindly help me out
================================================== ============================
Node 0: Process 2956: Received signal SIGSEGV.
================================================== ============================
================================================== ============================
Node 1: Process 13268: Received signal SIGSEGV.
================================================== ============================
================================================== ============================
Node 2: Process 4248: Received signal SIGSEGV.
================================================== ============================
================================================== ============================
Node 3: Process 3152: Received signal SIGSEGV.
================================================== ============================
================================================== ============================ -
April 23, 2019 at 12:07 pm
sooraj546
SubscriberKindly reply someone......................i dnt have any other technical supportÂ
the F_YI(f, t, 3) is varying in an increasing pattern shown below and F_R(f, t) varying in an decreasing pattern similarly but dnt know y the overall code is not working.
C_UDMI(F_C0(f,t),THREAD_T0(t),6)=0.0092976*F_YI(f, t, 3) its running fine
but when i introduce C_UDMI(F_C0(f,t),THREAD_T0(t),6)=0.0092976*F_YI(f, t, 3)*F_R(f, t); still not working same error exits. what to do -
April 23, 2019 at 12:12 pm
DrAmine
Ansys EmployeeTry using C_R of the neighboring cell.
-
April 23, 2019 at 2:09 pm
-
April 23, 2019 at 3:44 pm
DrAmine
Ansys EmployeeNow your UDM access is wrong and different to what you have posted. -
April 25, 2019 at 10:01 am
sooraj546
Subscriberthanks a lot everyone.........I have solved it in a different way
-
April 25, 2019 at 1:39 pm
DrAmine
Ansys EmployeeThanks for the update. Please mark this as is solved.
-
June 26, 2019 at 2:21 pm
sooraj546
Subscriber
You should just need to alter the above example to suit the maths and use the source in the species equation. Remember to also remove the same amount of material as a mass sink too. Assuming "conc_co" is a species concentration, you'll need to find that macro too.Â
Â
i am not able to understand that concept completely could you kindly elaborate a bit
-
May 13, 2020 at 3:07 pm
KgpNiko16
SubscriberPlease post here , how you solved the problem ?
-
May 13, 2020 at 3:29 pm
KgpNiko16
SubscriberCan you step by step tell about how to implement the wall mass flux boundary condition.
-
- The topic ‘Wall boundary mass flux ?’ is closed to new replies.
-
6660
-
1906
-
1469
-
1313
-
1022
© 2026 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
