TAGGED: cfx-3d-geometry
-
-
September 21, 2021 at 10:18 am
WesRamm
SubscriberHello, I have been tasked with doing some numerical simulation on a pre-existing radial turbine, for which I have the solid models.
I have meshed the solid and fluid parts and can import them into CFX Pre.
I am looking for a tutorial that shows how to do a radial machinery analysis with CFX for geometries that do NOT start with bladegen and turbogrid, and it seems that all of the shipping examples use this workflow. Because I have the full 3D geometry, it seems that I cannot use 'turbomachinery' mode, as this seems to use a single-passage geometry definition from turbogrid.
Is anyone aware of a CFX tutorial that shows how to set up a simulation for a radial turbine, including defining boundaries and interfaces when using full 3D geometry rather than the single-passage geometry that turbogrid generates?
Perhaps it would be better to use Fluent?
Thanks!
November 17, 2021 at 8:02 pmrfblumen
Ansys EmployeeIf working with the full wheel, there will be no periodic interfaces. The only boundary conditions will be for the inlet, outlet and walls. It you wish to post-process in Turbo mode in CFD-Post, you'll need to generate a region of boundary condition for the hub, shroud and blades.
The CFX tutorials related to other turbomachinery cases should be useful in setting up this problem. The geometry/meshing portion using turbo tools (e.g. BladeGen and TurboGrid) doesn't affect the setup in CFX-Pre other than Name Selections generated by TurboGrid - similar Name Selections can be created in Ansys Meshing.
Viewing 1 reply thread- The topic ‘Tutorial for CFX using full 3D Geometry not generated by bladegen/turbogrid’ is closed to new replies.
Ansys Innovation SpaceTrending discussionsTop Contributors-
3074
-
977
-
906
-
858
-
792
Top Rated Tags© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.
-