Ansys Assistant will be unavailable on the Learning Forum starting January 30. An upgraded version is coming soon. We apologize for any inconvenience and appreciate your patience. Stay tuned for updates.
Fluids

Fluids

Topics related to Fluent, CFX, Turbogrid and more.

TKE underprediction in shear layer

TAGGED: , ,

    • pablobhs
      Subscriber

      I am trying to model a hot jet impinging at an angle on an effusion cooling plate. While comparing my simulation with a colleague's results, I saw severe underprediction of TKE generation in my shear regions. I plotted production of k which seems to be fine, however the dissipation is probably too high. Is the fix more mesh-related or a turbulence model issue? Im using k-omega sst with default settings except production limiter is turned off and viscous heating and corner flow correction are turned on. 

       

       

    • Essence
      Ansys Employee

      Hello,

      Mesh is a bit slender at inflation layers. This can create the cell jump issues. Can you try using polyhedra mesh?

      • pablobhs
        Subscriber

        Hey, thanks for the reply.

        I did try a polyhedra mesh but the solution was diverging, maybe i need to resolve it better.

        What about the free shear region? That has structured cells everywhere still the TKE generation is poor.

    • Essence
      Ansys Employee

      The issue may be related to sudden cell jumps in shear region. Since the velocity is quite high, these cell jumps can be detrimental to the solution.

      Is the cross-section a square or a circular? Two-equation models are known to overpredict dissipation, which can result in lower TKE. Please use higher order discretization schemes. Ensure the y+ values are adequate.

      • pablobhs
        Subscriber

        The cross section is essentially a "sliver" of two rows of cooling holes, 2.18mm wide. 

        y+ is <0.3 throughout the domain, except on the free slip "side walls" where its 0.5.

        I tried running a transition SST with QUICK discretization schemes for everything. No noticable changes. 

         

        • Essence
          Ansys Employee

          I see. Thanks for the information. What about the mesh? For the given velocity field, the mesh seems a bit coarse. Can you try to run the case once using Reynolds Stress Model (RSM)? This will help us to narrow down the issue.

        • pablobhs
          Subscriber

          Here's how the global mesh looks. Max. cell length is 3e-4m. 

          Ran the RSM model. It gave a floating point exception with QUICK schemes and diverged with 1st order upwind schemes.

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
[bingo_chatbox]