We have an exciting announcement about badges coming in May 2025. Until then, we will temporarily stop issuing new badges for course completions and certifications. However, all completions will be recorded and fulfilled after May 2025.
General Mechanical

General Mechanical

Topics related to Mechanical Enterprise, Motion, Additive Print and more.

Stress too high in transient simulation.

    • nm0770
      Subscriber

      I would like to perform a transient simulation of carbon fiber components. The two sandwich plates with attached stiffening Rips are connected using bonded MPC contacts.

      The boundary conditions are as follows: on the front side, a remote displacement is fully constrained in all directions and on the rear side, it is constrained in such a way that expansion in the length direction is still possible.The plates rest on 8 points on the ground. 
      These points are constrained in the Z direction using remote boundary conditions. (Also tried with fixed fixed configuration same result.)

      I applied measured accelerations to each of the 8 boundary conditions on the ground (6000 steps measured at 10 000 Hz -> as I understand, this results in a time step of 1/10 000 (Mesurement Time was 0.6 seconds)).
      The mesh used has already been applied in static simulations and has converged in those cases.I am outputting the equivalent stresses and obtaining a maximum of approximately 6000 MPa, which I consider unrealistic. 
      The maximum stresses occur in the area of the support points on the ground.

      My main idea is to perform a static analysis that includes gravitational acceleration, followed by a indeoendent transient simulation.
      I would then sum the maximum stresses from both analyses (at a critical Element of the geometry). If the sum of these stresses is below the fatigue limit (~450 MPa), can I assume that the structure is durable and will not experience fatigue failure? Is this approach valid for a preliminary  assesment, or are there other factors I should consider?

      Can anyone provide me with tips on how to proceed, or possible Problems?

    • danielshaw
      Ansys Employee

      If you are sure that the alternating stress is below the endurance limit, you can assume infinite life. Based on the S-N curve that you showed, this material appears to have a well-defined endurance limit at about 450 MPa, but in general 

      1. Not all materials have a well-defined endurance limit.  So, if the part experiences very high cycle fatigue, you may not be able to assume infinite life,
      2. 450 MPa seems like a relatively high endurance limit.
    • dlooman
      Ansys Employee

      The gravity step can be solved with time-integration off in the Analysis Settings details to avoid any dynamic effect from gravity.

    • dlooman
      Ansys Employee

      The gravity step can be solved with time-integration off in the Analysis Settings details to avoid any dynamic effect from gravity.

    • nm0770
      Subscriber

      @danielshaw: Thank you for your feedback. The Wöhler diagram is from the materials I actually use.

      @dlooman: Even if i would place a Point Mass on the Panels?

      Is it possible that this behaviour can be caused by a sensor offset. When integrating the offset the values are increasing over time?


Viewing 4 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.