-
-
April 9, 2024 at 10:51 amJan-Patrice SIMONEAUSubscriber
Hello, I am trying to follow the approach 1 of the document entitled "Setting Up the Periodic Pressure Drop as an Output Parameter". The first window is Ok :
but Fluent does not create automatically the report definition, as it should do according to the document :Â
It is therefore not possible to follow the proess.
Thanks for your help.
-
April 9, 2024 at 11:13 amRobForum Moderator
Which document is that?
-
April 9, 2024 at 11:20 amJan-Patrice SIMONEAUSubscriber
This is this document : https://support.ansys.com/knowledgeresources/getfile?fn=2067016_Periodic_pressure_drop_as_output_parameter_2021.pdf&fp=%2Fsolutions%2Fattach%2F2067016_Periodic_pressure_drop_as_output_parameter_2021.pdf
-
April 9, 2024 at 12:56 pmRobForum Moderator
Did you use a periodic pair defined from the mesh or the non-conformal approach?Â
-
April 9, 2024 at 2:05 pmRobForum Moderator
And have you run the model & displayed the "periodic static pressure" on the boundary?
-
April 10, 2024 at 6:16 amJan-Patrice SIMONEAUSubscriber
We use a non-conformal approach, ran the model and dispayed the periodic static pressure.
Â
-
April 10, 2024 at 8:58 amRobForum Moderator
I wonder if the report is linked to the conformal option. On older cases the periodic was a single boundary so getting a "pressure" on both ends wasn't possible whereas the nonconformal option has an interface at each end.Â
It worked on a test case here, but the report only triggered after running the model. Good spot, and it'll give the solution author something to do for a day or two! :)Â Â
-
April 11, 2024 at 6:41 amJan-Patrice SIMONEAUSubscriber
ok thanks,Â
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
-
441
-
199
-
184
-
162
-
142
© 2024 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.