-
-
May 20, 2024 at 5:57 pmdeepesh.p.gurdasaniSubscriber
1) If I give input PSD data such that RMS input value is around 100 g, what should be an ideal response RMS value at any given point ?Â
2) I give input PSD, then check response RMS value by inserting 'response PSD' at given nodal location / vertex . Is this the correct way to check the result ?
Â
Thanks in advance
-
May 21, 2024 at 1:18 pmChandra SekaranAnsys Employee
The response would depend on the natural frequencies and mode shapes of the structure to which you apply the input PSD.
For the results, you can look at 1 sigma response of displacement/stress/velocity etc. Or you can do a response PSD at any location.
-
May 21, 2024 at 4:28 pmdeepesh.p.gurdasaniSubscriber
But just like the modes extracted should be 1.5x the last input frequency, isnt there any such rule that response RMS should be some 3x, 4x, etc. of the input RMS for the result to be correct ?
-
-
May 21, 2024 at 3:07 pmdloomanAnsys Employee
The rms of an acceleration psd could be applied in a static analysis to get the static part of the response. The actual response should be greater due to the dynamic effect. The rms of a narrow band psd could be applied in a harmonic analysis at the central frequency as a check.
-
May 21, 2024 at 4:35 pmdeepesh.p.gurdasaniSubscriber
The RMS of any band PSD (I am assuming one of the frequencies of PSD, probably central frequence is what you mean) if applied in harmonic analysis, what check can I get from it?Â
-
-
May 21, 2024 at 4:43 pmdloomanAnsys Employee
The harmonic results will match the PSD 1 sigma results.
-
May 21, 2024 at 5:28 pmdeepesh.p.gurdasaniSubscriber
suppose I have 5 frequencies with g^2/Hz values
1Hz, 2Hz, 3Hz, 4Hz, 5Hz and its g^2/Hz values (Here By central frequency you mean 3 Hz here I assume (Please correct me if central frequency is some concept here) . Now in harmonic if I give 3 Hz as frequency and a load/force for it, wouldnt it apply sinusoidal load by default at 3 Hz? whereas in PSD data, the data might not be equivalent to a sinusoidal type force.
-
May 22, 2024 at 4:40 pmdloomanAnsys Employee
That's not a narrow band PSD, but yes if you ran a harmonic analysis at 3 hz with the rms value and the same damping you would get a similar result to the 1 sigma PSD value. I like this analogous solution as a check and also as a way of getting a better feel for what the PSD really is.
-
May 23, 2024 at 6:19 pmdeepesh.p.gurdasaniSubscriber
Any specific reason why 1 sigma value of PSD would match harmonic analysis done at central frequency ?
-
May 23, 2024 at 6:39 pmdloomanAnsys Employee
Yes, it's because a PSD analysis is essentially a harmonic analysis of an acceleration distribution. One method of solving the PSD (not used in Ansys) is to do harmonic sweep and integrate the results.
-
May 29, 2024 at 6:30 pmdeepesh.p.gurdasaniSubscriber
but in 'Harmonic analysis', by default the load would be applied in sinusoidal type, right? where as in PSD, it depends on the PSD data and moreover its random vibration. How can both be same ? (though it could match with sigma 1 value but I am trying to understand the logic behind it)
-
May 29, 2024 at 6:50 pmdloomanAnsys Employee
The excitation is random with respect to phase and amplitude, but the excitations are still assumed to be sinusoidal.
-
- The topic ‘Response PSD and RMS value’ is closed to new replies.
- Problem with access to session files
- Ayuda con Error: “Unable to access the source: EngineeringData”
- Reaction forces and moments during random vibration at local coordinate systems
- At least one body has been found to have only 1 element in at least 2 directions
- Using APDL to extract stresses on a beam element.
- How to select the interface delamination surface of a laminate?
- Geometric stiffness matrix for solid elements
- Non-linear convergence issue
- Computation Accleration
- Timestep range set for animation export
-
1131
-
468
-
455
-
225
-
201
© 2024 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.