-
-
July 3, 2024 at 1:17 amsme8Subscriber
Hey,
I use an embedded high-Q analyzer in the FDTD module. Essentially, I use ring-down to estimate the quality factor of ultra-high Q factors. However, I realized that the Q factor it calculates is highly dependent on the source settings. For example, I set all the parameters the same for two simulations and only modified the wavelength of the source. I found that if I set my source wavelength to 700-900 nm, the quality factor is different from another simulation with a wavelength of 740-760 nm. Assume my desired resonance occurs at 750 nm. Please be informed that and the resonant wavelength does not change with different source wavelengths. I use an auto non-uniform mesh for my simulations.
I also modified the time domain properties of my source to have a very narrow band signal in the frequency domain (consequently wide in the time domain) near my resonant wavelength, and again, the Q factor changed dramatically.
What do you think? Which one is more accurate?
Thank you for your support and help.
-
July 8, 2024 at 4:22 pm
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
- 怎么修改生成远场图片的横纵坐标以及坐标标签的字体大小
- INTERCONNECT – No results unless rerun simulation until it gives any
- 如何直观计算3db带宽
- EME得到的S参数与监视器结果不一致的问题
- varFDTD半导体激光器建模方向及反射率设置问题
- INTERCONNECT – obtain power output over time & check for SNR
- Import material .txt file with script
- Inverse Design Freezing Issue
- Calculation of correlation values in laser modulation bandwidth simulation
-
456
-
205
-
194
-
177
-
162
© 2024 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.