-
-
November 4, 2024 at 2:31 amfrank.wangSubscriber
-
November 4, 2024 at 12:00 pmRobForum Moderator
Check you actually have a valid mesh from the preview. From memory whilst you may get some surface cells there's something missing so you don't technically have a mesh. No mesh means no metrics. Inflation may force another effect so you have something to report.Â
For 3d I'd tend to favour Fluent Meshing in most scenarios now. For extruded geometry Ansys Meshing (termed Mechanical or Workbench Meshing too) still has some advantages but with more stuff going into Fluent Meshing it'll not be long before we can do everything thing there.Â
-
Viewing 1 reply thread
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Ansys Innovation Space
Trending discussions
- error udf
- Help: About the expression of turbulent viscosity in Realizable k-e model
- Unburnt Hydrocarbons contour in ANSYS FORTE for sector mesh
- Fluent fails with Intel MPI protocol on 2 nodes
- Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM
- Diesel with Ammonia/Hydrogen blend combustion
- Non-Intersected faces found for matching interface periodic-walls
- Mass Conservation Issue in Methane Pyrolysis Shock Tube Simulation
- Encountering Error in Heterogeneous Surface Reaction
- How to obtain axial and tangential velocity in CFX-post?
Top Contributors
-
1156
-
488
-
481
-
225
-
201
Top Rated Tags
© 2024 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.