-
-
November 4, 2024 at 2:31 amfrank.wangSubscriber
-
November 4, 2024 at 12:00 pmRobForum Moderator
Check you actually have a valid mesh from the preview. From memory whilst you may get some surface cells there's something missing so you don't technically have a mesh. No mesh means no metrics. Inflation may force another effect so you have something to report.Â
For 3d I'd tend to favour Fluent Meshing in most scenarios now. For extruded geometry Ansys Meshing (termed Mechanical or Workbench Meshing too) still has some advantages but with more stuff going into Fluent Meshing it'll not be long before we can do everything thing there.Â
-
Viewing 1 reply thread
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Ansys Innovation Space
Trending discussions
- Non-Intersected faces found for matching interface periodic-walls
- Unburnt Hydrocarbons contour in ANSYS FORTE for sector mesh
- Help: About the expression of turbulent viscosity in Realizable k-e model
- Fluent fails with Intel MPI protocol on 2 nodes
- Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM
- error udf
- Mass Conservation Issue in Methane Pyrolysis Shock Tube Simulation
- Script Error
- Facing trouble regarding setting up boundary conditions for SOEC Modeling
- UDF, Fluent: Access count of iterations for “Steady Statistics”
Top Contributors
-
1406
-
599
-
591
-
550
-
366
Top Rated Tags
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.