-
-
September 1, 2019 at 4:06 am
Doba
Subscriber -
September 1, 2019 at 4:37 pm
peteroznewman
SubscriberI recommend you go back to the geometry editor and add a blend radius to every point of every triangle. That will allow the inflation to smoothly work its way around each triangle "vertex" because there will be a tangent curve to wrap around.
-
September 2, 2019 at 7:34 am
Doba
SubscriberYou mean every edge? As the flow is facing the triangular top of the prisms, I am thinking of adding blend radius only to edges along that, not the perpendicular edges as their sharpness isn't affecting the inflation (I hope that was understandable)
-
September 2, 2019 at 10:41 am
Rob
Forum ModeratorIf you're meshing inside the beam structure too reduce the minimum cell size: part of your problem is how the inflation is interacting with the background cell size.Â
-
September 2, 2019 at 5:45 pm
peteroznewman
SubscriberIn a 2D view, each triangle has a vertex or point at the corner. In 3D extrusion of that 2D view, that vertex becomes an edge. Yes, I mean every edge at the vertex.
rwoolhou makes a good point to use smaller elements on the faces that are not triangles. You could pick all the sides of the triangle and bias the nodes to each vertex. That would also help.
-
September 3, 2019 at 12:42 pm
Doba
Subscriber
If you're meshing inside the beam structure too reduce the minimum cell size: part of your problem is how the inflation is interacting with the background cell size.Â
You mean the "Element size" or "Curvature/Proximity min size"?
-
September 3, 2019 at 12:44 pm
Rob
Forum ModeratorYes, either, both. Have a look at the sizes compared with your model and alter to suit.Â
Â
-
September 7, 2019 at 6:32 am
Doba
SubscriberSo I have tried adding blend radius and reduce the minimum cell size (along with some other settings like growth rate and defeature size) but I still can't get it right.
From the 2nd image you can see that the worst elements are near the bottom and top of the prism. This is where the inflation layers are starting to form. I noticed that the section where all layers have been "set", there are hardly any bad elements.
Do you guys have any other tips?
-
September 9, 2019 at 12:04 pm
Rob
Forum ModeratorTry one layer only, and further increase the resolution on the solid faces/volume.Â
-
September 9, 2019 at 12:54 pm
peteroznewman
SubscriberSince the worst elements are where the inflation layers start and end, try slicing the fluid volume at those two planes (and form a multibody part to use shared topology) then mesh that body first (selective body meshing). If you slice the volume that way, does that make that body sweepable? If so, you would have a face to mesh and then sweep along with mostly hex elements.
-
- The topic ‘Need help in fixing drop in mesh quality due to creation of stairstep mesh after adding inflation’ is closed to new replies.
-
4683
-
1565
-
1386
-
1242
-
1021
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.


