Fluids

Fluids

Topics related to Fluent, CFX, Turbogrid and more.

Near wall modeling

    • cptblackburn
      Subscriber

      I am trying to understand Shock - Boundary layer interactions. Currently, I am simulating the flow of M 1.7 over a flat plate, with impinging shock at various downstream locations. I wanted to resolve the boundary layer accurately. First I made a mesh with Y+ nearly 1, but the velocity profile did not match with the PIV measurements from the actual experiment. To figure out whether meshing is the issue, I increased the first cell thickness from 0.0008 to 0.04 mm. A comparison of the velocity profiles in both cases is attached here with PIV measurements. Why they are exactly similar? Then what is the use in keeping Y+ near 1 to get an accurate measurement? I am using kw SST turbulence model.

    • Federico
      Ansys Employee

      Other factors such as turbulence conditions (inlet) and/or wall roughness will have an impact on the resulting boundary layer.

      k-w can do well (specially for a simple case of flow over a flat plate) when the y+ ~ 30-60. 

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • The topic ‘Near wall modeling’ is closed to new replies.