We have an exciting announcement about badges coming in May 2025. Until then, we will temporarily stop issuing new badges for course completions and certifications. However, all completions will be recorded and fulfilled after May 2025.
Fluids

Fluids

Topics related to Fluent, CFX, Turbogrid and more.

Near wall modeling

    • cptblackburn
      Subscriber

      I am trying to understand Shock - Boundary layer interactions. Currently, I am simulating the flow of M 1.7 over a flat plate, with impinging shock at various downstream locations. I wanted to resolve the boundary layer accurately. First I made a mesh with Y+ nearly 1, but the velocity profile did not match with the PIV measurements from the actual experiment. To figure out whether meshing is the issue, I increased the first cell thickness from 0.0008 to 0.04 mm. A comparison of the velocity profiles in both cases is attached here with PIV measurements. Why they are exactly similar? Then what is the use in keeping Y+ near 1 to get an accurate measurement? I am using kw SST turbulence model.

    • Federico
      Ansys Employee

      Other factors such as turbulence conditions (inlet) and/or wall roughness will have an impact on the resulting boundary layer.

      k-w can do well (specially for a simple case of flow over a flat plate) when the y+ ~ 30-60. 

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • The topic ‘Near wall modeling’ is closed to new replies.