-
-
April 10, 2024 at 11:42 amEleftherios MarinelisSubscriber
Hello everyone! I am perfroming a simulation for the NACA0012 Airfoil for my thesis, and I have a very particular question, if someone wants to help me is much appreciated!
Basically I am running the simulation for 3 degrees angle, and while my lift coefficient is just fine (accoridng to Sheldahl etÂ
al.), my drag coefficient is completely wrong (negative value), while Sheldahl et al. gives a positive one. Also I want to mention that everything is working fine in o degrees angle.Can someone help me please?
-
April 10, 2024 at 12:27 pmRobForum Moderator
If you compare what you're doing with the example in Help (you may need to wait as the site isn't working at present) what are you doing differently?
-
April 10, 2024 at 1:25 pmEleftherios MarinelisSubscriber
Â
Basically for every different angles 0, 3,5,9 everything is just fine with the lift coefficient.
But with the drag there is a problem, drag coefficients are negative (!) and they have various differences compared to exprimental values. Why only drag have the problem?
These are my settings: Could you please check them? Thank you!
Â
Â
-
April 10, 2024 at 2:13 pmRobForum Moderator
Looks fine. Now have a look at how the coefficients are calculated in the tutorial as I suggested.Â
-
April 10, 2024 at 2:44 pmEleftherios MarinelisSubscriber
Where can I find this tutorial? Could you please post me the link?
Thank you!
-
April 10, 2024 at 2:49 pmRobForum Moderator
Open Fluent, click on Help, and navigate to the top level of Fluent's page.Â
-
April 11, 2024 at 10:21 amEleftherios MarinelisSubscriber
Hello!
I had a look at some things as you suggested, but still I cannot find the mistake since lift is just fine while in the same measuremnt drag is not.
Do you have any ideas?
-
April 11, 2024 at 10:46 amRobForum Moderator
How well resolved is the wake? How does the drag force (not coefficient) tie up with what you're expecting? Images of the results may help.Â
-
April 11, 2024 at 11:39 amEleftherios MarinelisSubscriber
Â
These are the plots for 3 degres, ideally I wanted Cl=0.32 and Cd=0.0056 (not negative value)
Â
Â
These are the plots for 5 degrees, ideally I wanted Cl=0.5385 and Cd=0.00128 and not -0.0345.
Â
Â
Â
Â
So lift in every measuremnt is right but drag not, except of 0 degrees. If you need anything more please ask me to send.
Thanks for you time and help!
-
April 11, 2024 at 12:05 pmRobForum Moderator
And the contours? Have you checked the reference area?Â
-
April 11, 2024 at 12:49 pm
-
April 11, 2024 at 1:02 pmRobForum Moderator
In 2d make sure nothing is selected. Looking at the line, do you have separation on the leading edge? Please compare the reference values with what you need for the coefficient comparison. Details on those will be in the tutorial.Â
-
April 12, 2024 at 7:46 amEleftherios MarinelisSubscriber
What do you mean in 2D? Where? Also could you please elaborate on this seperation? Is there any way to send you the files to check that for 5 minutes by yourself please? I want help.
Â
Thank you so much!
-
April 12, 2024 at 9:02 amRobForum Moderator
I'm not permitted to download or open anything from the Forum. It's the compromise with Legal that allows me to answer anything on here.Â
If you're running the model in 2d make sure there are no faces selected in the contour panel. In 3d create a surface on the mid plane, or anywhere else that's useful for post processing.Â
Separation - as in flow detaches from the surface. I'm a Chemical Engineer, well that's my degree from well over 20 years ago, but I'm fairly sure wings work better when the flow is attached to the surface. Â
-
April 12, 2024 at 12:10 pm
-
April 12, 2024 at 12:25 pmRobForum Moderator
Yes, angle & reference values are quite important for lift & drag.
Have you turned the Energy equation on?Â
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
- How do you approach this?
- Convective Augmentation Factor in DEFINE_HEAT_FLUX
- Conservation issue with a UDS solution
- Where is the Electrolyte Projected Area in the Reports tab of PEMFC Model?
- ANSYS fluent – Rocky DEM coupling
- Solar load , Mesh Orientation and Beam direction
- Non-Premixed Combustion PDF generation with 4th-order interpolation
-
446
-
199
-
194
-
166
-
162
© 2024 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.