-
-
June 14, 2021 at 10:06 am
Zainaba98
SubscriberHi everyone,
So I have a cube, where I have applied an angular displacement (using remote displacement). When I wanted to measure the moment reaction on that face, I have two location methods: Boundary Condition and Geometry Selection. Each one of these methods, is giving very different results.
Can any1 explain this to me please?
1- BC:
June 16, 2021 at 10:29 am1shan
Ansys EmployeeThe remote displacement moments is calculated at the corresponding remote point , while the moment reaction scoped to the geometry face is calculated at the face of the centroid (summation point) to which it is scoped. In your case these 2 do not match and hence the difference in results. You could scope the remote point to center of the face (use the 'click to change option' and select the face) and check whether results match. You could check the location of summation point by viewing the arrow head displayed when using the moment probe.
When you apply a remote displacement the solver internally creates rigid spider elements (click on solution information to visualize these) which link the scoped geometry nodes to the remote point. When you apply a remoted displacement, it is applied to this remote point (and not to the face). So even though the faces moves in X,Y,Z the remote point doesn't. You can refer to this informative discussion by Peter /forum/discussion/19833/how-to-apply-rigid-body-element-2-rbe2-in-ansys-mechanical.
Regards Ishan.
June 17, 2021 at 2:35 pmZainaba98
SubscriberHi Shan,
thanks for your reply.
In fact as u see in the following picture, the remote point is scoped to the center of the face HOWEVER, the moments calculated by selecting remote point are not the same as when selecting 'geometry selection':
1-

2- Just to make sure I well understood your point, if I have a remote point scope to the center of a face, and we apply a rotation to the remote point, the face it's scoped to is going to rotate by the same angles but it's not the case for translational displacement?
June 17, 2021 at 2:49 pmZainaba98
SubscriberI would like to also note that even for other simulations where I apply a displacement on a face (no remote points just ordinary displacements), I get a difference in the moment reaction calculation when selecting the face by 'geometry selection' vs when I choose 'Boundary Condition', however the difference is not as significant as with BC's with remote points...
BC:

Moment reaction by 'Boundary condition':
Moment reaction by 'geometry selection':

Viewing 3 reply threads- The topic ‘Moment reaction Probe: difference btw Location Method ‘Boundary Condition’ & ‘Geometry Selection’’ is closed to new replies.
Innovation SpaceTrending discussionsTop Contributors-
5899
-
1906
-
1420
-
1306
-
1021
Top Rated Tags© 2026 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.
-
The Ansys Learning Forum is a public forum. You are prohibited from providing (i) information that is confidential to You, your employer, or any third party, (ii) Personal Data or individually identifiable health information, (iii) any information that is U.S. Government Classified, Controlled Unclassified Information, International Traffic in Arms Regulators (ITAR) or Export Administration Regulators (EAR) controlled or otherwise have been determined by the United States Government or by a foreign government to require protection against unauthorized disclosure for reasons of national security, or (iv) topics or information restricted by the People's Republic of China data protection and privacy laws.
