TAGGED: #fluent-#ansys, #fluent-#cfd-#ansys, #multiphase_models, ansys-fluent, dpm, mhd, mhd-model
-
-
November 29, 2024 at 8:02 am
ntrippella
SubscriberHi,
I was trying to simulate the effect of a permanent magnet (a mangetic candle) on small solid ferromagentic paerticle in a water solution.Â
In particular, particles are supposed to rotate around the magnet (this is how the device works).Â
I have designed a simple magnetic candle in Ansys Maxwell. I have imported its B field inside fluent. You can see it on this figure:
(the white rectangle is where the magnete is supposed to be placed)Â
Â
Then I have activated the DPM and the MHD module.
The simulation converges.
However, the particles seems not to be affected by the magentic field. I tried changing their diameters, from 1e-6 to 1e-4 but nothing changes.
Even though I amplify it in the MHD module by a factor of 10, it seems to have zero effects on the particles trajectories.Â
What do you think? I am doing something wrong on the simulation or the magnet is too weak? The weired thing is that even with a 10 factor amplification, i obtain the same results.Â
-
November 29, 2024 at 9:27 am
Rob
Forum ModeratorDid you turn on anything in Fluent to tell the DPM particles about the magnetic field?
-
November 29, 2024 at 9:37 am
-
November 29, 2024 at 9:56 am
Rob
Forum ModeratorI assume the particles have a charge? Does anything change if you switch to transient particles? I'll need to check this side if we have anything we can share. Â
-
November 29, 2024 at 10:03 am
ntrippella
SubscriberI have not tried with transient simulation. Do you think something could change?Â
Particles are ferromagnetic particles with zero electric charge. I have tried stressing their permeability to 100 but it does not worked.
I could share my .cas file, could you please give me your email and I will send to you with we transfer if you have time
Â
-
November 29, 2024 at 10:29 am
Rob
Forum ModeratorWe're not permitted to download or receive files due to the Forum being "public". Commercial users with paid support can also raise tickets to do what you propose.Â
I was wondering if transient tracking was needed as there's no reason for a particle to move once it arrives at the high/low/neutral charge point. So transient might at least show movement, albeit, not necessarily where you wanted it.Â
-
November 29, 2024 at 10:34 am
ntrippella
SubscriberI could try with transient simulation. However, now I was trying simulating greater particles (D form 1e-6 to 1e-5), to see whetere there could be changes.Â
-
November 29, 2024 at 11:06 am
Rob
Forum ModeratorPossibly. As particles become smaller the drag effects may outweigh other body forces. But you tried 1e-4m already?
-
November 29, 2024 at 12:27 pm
-
November 29, 2024 at 12:32 pm
ntrippella
SubscriberYes, I have activated the Include Lorentz Forca option.Â
However, I have set the charge value equal to 0. Why do you think I have to chnage it to -500?
The small particles are ferromagnetic particles. I think they are not electrically charged. They represent the small dirt that can be present inside water in water hydraulic systems.
-
November 29, 2024 at 3:24 pm
Ulrich
Ansys Employee"-500" was just an arbitrary number.
If you look at the equation for the Lorentz force acting on the particle (see eq. (21-27) in te R 2024 R2 Fluent Theory Guide) you see that the force is zero without a charge.
-
November 29, 2024 at 3:32 pm
ntrippella
SubscriberYes. Indeed the force for the particle should be the magnetic force associated to their permability which is different from the lorentz force, i suppose.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
-
2999
-
970
-
857
-
761
-
599
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.