TAGGED: apdl, contact, structural
-
-
May 29, 2024 at 4:40 am
ganeshbaabu
SubscriberIn Mechanical APDL, I have a model with 3 contact pairs - all of them are "Bonded (Always)" type and are surface to surface. The element load balance ratio for this problem is ~7.6, which way higher than the recommended value of 1. There are geometric and material nonlinearities as well in the model. The solve time currently is ~28 hours with 144 cores of HPC. Is there a way to reduce the load balance ratio and/or reduce the solve time?
-
May 30, 2024 at 8:56 am
Aniket
Forum Moderatorwhich version are you using? Which contact elements are you using? Please check the following page for more information about solving large contact models in DMP environment:
3.16. Solving Large Contact Models in a Distributed-Memory Parallel Environment (ansys.com)-Aniket
-
May 31, 2024 at 6:28 am
ganeshbaabu
SubscriberÂ
Thanks for the link you shared.
Version is 2022R2. Element types are CONTA174 and TARGE170.Â
Â
-
May 31, 2024 at 8:38 am
Aniket
Forum Moderatorconta174 should be supported for contact splitting, conta175 is not, as mentioned in the last section. Please try using contact splitting techniques and see if it helps improve the load balance ratio and performance.
-Aniket
-
-
- The topic ‘[Mechanical APDL] Reducing element load balance ratio in a model with contacts’ is closed to new replies.
- At least one body has been found to have only 1 element in at least 2 directions
- Script Error Code:800a000d
- Element has excessive thickness change, distortion, is turning inside out
- Elastic limit load, Elastic-plastic limit load
- Image to file in Mechanical is bugged and does not show text
- Help to do quasistatic analysis in static structural module
-
1937
-
839
-
599
-
591
-
366
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.