Learning Forum

[zwong32]

Hi all,

Hope all is well with you. I'm trying to implement 2 layering zones inside my simulation both of which are occurring at the same time. I get a SIGSEGV error with the message "free(): corrupted unsorted chunks." I don't think my UDF is a problem because I tested it on a simpler dynamic case, and didn't get this error. I think my error comes from how I specify the boundary conditions but I wanted to double check (see figure below). My question is: Is it possible for two touching zones to layer in opposite directions provided that the mesh interface between the two zones are stationary? Thank you again so much!

 

 

[Federico]

Hello, 

hard to tell without having the labels for each dynamic mesh zone on your screenshot. I assume that both walls translating to the left move together, right?

If so, this motion is possible. Horizontal interfaces should be set as Deforming. What is interior-tulip-border?

[zoelle.wong]

Apologies; there are 3 translating walls with the arrow indicating the direction (see below). Interior-Tulip-Border is the name of Zone 3 below in the figure below. 

 

By horizontal interfaces, do you mean Stationary Intf3 and Stationary Intf 4? 

[Federico]

I am referring to both walls moving towards the left. They need to be moving together for layering to work.

[Federico]

This is what I would suggest:

 

Set Zone 1 and Zone 3 with rigid body motion (the cell zones, not interior-faces). With this approach, you ensure that layering occurs away from the moving boundaries, which is better for the solver.

[zoelle.wong]

Ah ok - makes sense. Will follow up as questions arise, thank you for helping!

[Federico]

Let us know how it goes!

[zoelle.wong]

It worked out! It looks SO cool- thank you thank you!

Have another follow up question: This time, I need to have a very small gap distance between two walls as seen in the figure below. Zone 1 will be a block of structured cells in the final simulation. I'm running into trouble with Zone 3. I need a very small gap distance between the two walls, and FLUENT can't generate a mesh interface at "mesh inlet 4".. (looking into this and will prob post another follow-up question about this).

My thought process is to either (1): prescribe the interior of zone 3 as a block of unstructured cells that are "deforming" rather than "layering" or (2): split zone 2 into 2 blocks, one consistenting of structured cells and the second consisting of  unstructured cells. Would (2) be more stable than (1)?

Thank you again so much!!

[Federico]

 

Awesome! I’m glad you got this to work!

Regarding your latest question, we should look into why you cannot generate a mesh interface at Mesh inlet 4. I’ll look for your next post.

Here is what I would suggest:

Make a separate zone (red below). Let’s call it Zone 4. Zone 4 should be structured mesh, to allow layering. Set mesh inlet 4 and Mesh interface 1 as Stationary and have Zone 4 with Rigid body motion. You should see collapsing layers at Mesh inlet 4 and adding layers at Mesh interface 1.

Have Zone 3 with the same Rigid body motion. You can leave it as unstructured if it is easier for you to achieve a better quality mesh, since Zone 3 will be moving rigidly.