We’re putting the final touches on our new badges platform. Badge issuance remains temporarily paused, but all completions are being recorded and will be fulfilled once the platform is live. Thank you for your patience.
General Mechanical

General Mechanical

Topics related to Mechanical Enterprise, Motion, Additive Print and more.

Is there a difference between displacement and remote displacement for Workbench 2021 R1?

    • keey6tyl
      Subscriber

      Hi I have a confusion to be clarified. Is there a difference between displacement and remote displacement when assigned as supporting edges? Hereby I attached an archive with 2 similar system but one using remote displacement and another using displacement at the same edges. However the directional deformation result in Y-axis came out differently. Hope anyone can solve my confusion as I am very new to this software with very limited knowledge. Do point out my other flaws as well cause I am trying to model a flat slab plate and observe its behavior using this software. Thanks alot

    • Erik Kostson
      Ansys Employee


      See the documentation for displacement and remote displacement - in short the displacement is applied to the nodes on this edge (comes out as a D command in the ds.dat file), while the remote displacement does not have to be on an edge it can be a point outside the model. SO TheRemoteDisplacementboundary condition enables you to apply bothdisplacements and rotations (displacement can not apply rotations) at an arbitrary remote location in space.

      All the best

      Erik
    • keey6tyl
      Subscriber


      Thanks for resolving my confusion. However, this brings me to another question. Can I apply remote displacement instead of displacement while having the same boundary conditions? Because I am exploring if I can recreate a work by Chaudharri and Katti (2016) which looks like the diagram below:
      where the supporting I beams were offset 100m from the side edges. I am exploring if I can obtain the same result without actually model a solid I beam below the flat plate but only applying boundary condition in Ansys mechanical. So currently my idea is to use remote displacement and set the location 100m from the 4 edges but the support does not work as I expected. Is this method not workable? Or do I need more modification on my work?
    • Erik Kostson
      Ansys Employee
      Hi

      Just take away the steel beams you mention and use a Displacement boundary condition (not a remote displ.) on the slab (UX,UY,UZ). That is fine and that is typically OK, as seen in an example of punching shear (slide 9 in the link below, where the steel beams are just modeled as a displacement BC there) - use also this workflow below to model RC structure.

      Closing this post as it has been answered - if you have any other question open up a new one.

    • keey6tyl
      Subscriber


      Thanks a lot for all the replies as well as a very much needed post that you have just shared. Wish you a great day ahead!
    • Marianela Ripani
      Subscriber

      Dears, could you share again the link of the example of punching shear? Thanks in advance

Viewing 5 reply threads
  • The topic ‘Is there a difference between displacement and remote displacement for Workbench 2021 R1?’ is closed to new replies.