-
-
February 28, 2019 at 3:11 am
teguhhady
SubscriberDear all Â
I simulate flow in curved pipe in FLUENT 17.2. The velocity contour is good but streamline and velocity vectors are not good. It should be same as sample secondary flow in pipe elbow.
Â
Do you have any suggestion about my result?
Â
Thank you -
February 28, 2019 at 12:00 pm
Rob
Forum ModeratorPlease can you post the images into the message: as staff we can't download attachments. Also label the "not good" bits!
-
March 1, 2019 at 1:57 am
-
March 1, 2019 at 1:58 am
teguhhady
SubscriberI am sorry that the figure is not attached. Here, I post the pictures.Â
The velocity magnitude contour is ok. The left side of pipe is outer side of spiral coil. I see the velocity vectors and streamline are not like the bottom picture. I the axial velocity contribute this. I think to capture the secondary flow i should only use radial and tangential velocity. But, I dont know how to choose the axis because my case is spiral pipe.
Thank you for your help
Teguh
-
March 1, 2019 at 3:13 am
Keyur Kanade
Ansys Employeeare these images at the same section?
is your flow converged?
can you please insert you inlet & outlet conditions imagesÂ
-
March 2, 2019 at 6:39 am
teguhhady
Subscriberdear kkanade,Â
Â
Thank you for your reply. yes, all of them in the same location (downstream of coils). The flow is also converged. I am using inflation on the wall. My inlet is velocity inlet and outlet is outflow.
Thank you for your help
-
March 4, 2019 at 4:21 am
Keyur Kanade
Ansys Employeecan you please check by using pressure outlet.Â
-
March 5, 2019 at 12:04 pm
Rob
Forum ModeratorChange the vector options to "in plane". That will show the flow as per the section on your images.Â
-
March 5, 2019 at 12:39 pm
teguhhady
SubscriberDear rwoolhou
Â
Thank you for your reply. The picture of velocity vector I display in the previous post is already using vector option "in plane".  I still do not know why velocity vector and streamline are not good. I have tried some ways but it does not work
Â
thank you for your help
-
March 5, 2019 at 12:44 pm
teguhhady
SubscriberDear kkanade
Â
Before doing spiral case, I have tried straight ribbed tube to generate the secondary flow. secondary flow velocity vector and streamline are acceptable by using outflow boundary condition. So, I thought it was ok to use outflow BC. I will try pressure outlet.
Thank you for your help
-
March 6, 2019 at 10:24 am
Rob
Forum ModeratorCan you show why you'd expect to get flow like in the diagram? Flow around tight bends tends to generate swirl, I'd not expect two symmetrical flows unless there's something else going on.Â
-
March 18, 2019 at 2:51 am
teguhhady
SubscriberDear rwoolhou
Thank you for your reply. Well, Actually I am thinking about there is something happens. I was thinking that this is torsional effect of the coil but my supervisor does not agree with my reason. I see a paper "Numerical investigation of heat transfer and entropy generation of laminar flow in helical tubes with various cross sections" (I attach the result of their simulation). There is clear explanation about that. The paper also presents the secondary flow of the coil tube velocity contour and velocity vectors also same as mine. My supervisor tells me that my result is not correct. I am still trying to find how this happens.
Â
Thank you so much for your help
-
March 18, 2019 at 10:19 am
Rob
Forum ModeratorIs your model single phase and laminar? Assuming there is an inflation layer and y+ is about 1 (or less that 5) and you've done a mesh refinement study then I'd suggest your CFD result is correct. The bulk flow above looks sensible, I'm unsure of the secondary flow without running the model (and I'm not going to do that!). What does your supervisor think is going on?Â
As staff we're somewhat limited in how much engineering help we can offer as this is a public forum. In this case I don't know what the exact flow will be which avoids that issue!Â
-
March 19, 2019 at 1:27 am
teguhhady
SubscriberDear rwoolhou
Â
Thank you for your assistance. I am modeling single phase, laminar and turbulent flow. I do the inflation layer and my y+ is 1. I am still looking for the r5eason. Finnally, I find a paper which has same case and same streamline as mine.Â
I post the link if any other people have the same case as mine.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1687814017700059
Thanks you so much for your help.
Best regards
Â
-
- The topic ‘How to plot secondary flow velocity vector and streamline’ is closed to new replies.
-
5884
-
1906
-
1420
-
1306
-
1021
© 2026 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.


