-
-
May 22, 2024 at 6:21 am
-
May 22, 2024 at 4:33 pmAmrita PatiAnsys Employee
Hi,
The BFAST algorithm is known to be more numerically unstable compared to the FDTD, especially for steeper incidence angles. I will recommend you to have a look at this article: Broadband Fixed Angle Source Technique (BFAST). The section on numerical stability talks about possible causes of instability and the next section talks about the best tips for using such a source. I will also recommend you to try RCWA for the same setup at some point. The BFAST algorithm is slower than FDTD as it uses smaller time step, and as you are experiencing could be unstable. RCWA on the other hand will be much faster as it is semi-analytic and also doesn't required any special measures for simulating angled broadband source. You can add an RCWA object to the same simulation region and can also use it for comparison with FDTD result.
Regards,
Amrita -
May 23, 2024 at 3:29 amhhh hhhSubscriber
Ok, thank you for your help, later I will use RCWA to compare calculation again, thank you again.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
- Ansys Insight:使用Checkpoint继续仿真被迫中断或已经仿真结束的文件
- 怎么修改生成远场图片的横纵坐标以及坐标标签的字体大小
- INTERCONNECT – No results unless rerun simulation until it gives any
- EME得到的S参数与监视器结果不一致的问题
- 如何直观计算3db带宽
- INTERCONNECT – obtain power output over time & check for SNR
- varFDTD半导体激光器建模方向及反射率设置问题
- Inverse Design Freezing Issue
- Calculation of correlation values in laser modulation bandwidth simulation
-
421
-
192
-
178
-
162
-
140
© 2024 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.