-
-
May 21, 2024 at 5:47 pmAbha MauryaSubscriber
I am trying to get the results of a paper but my results are not exactly same, although I put exact parameters like the dimension of structure (periodic), meshing, materials, source type(plane wave), and boundary conditions, I am still unable to generate the exact result, it differs a little bit from the original.
any suggestion for this? how can I get the exact result?
-
May 21, 2024 at 6:16 pmAmrita PatiAnsys Employee
Hi Abha,
It could be due to a lot of reasons. It can be challenging to predict without looking at the simualtion file in detail. But this will give you a general idea: Ansys Insight: Why my simulation result is different from published paper or experiment?
Regards,
Amrita -
May 21, 2024 at 6:43 pmAbha MauryaSubscriber
thank you for your reply.
one more question, how can I decide the source location if the structure is periodic with a plane wave source?
-
May 21, 2024 at 6:52 pmAmrita PatiAnsys Employee
Hi Abha,
If you are placing the source in a lossless medium, I think only the phase will be affected, other parameters like transmission won't be affected depending upon the location of the source. In general, it is advised to keep the source and the geometry lambda/2 distance away from the PML to avoid injection errors and also reflections from PML. What kind of PML profile are you using (the default is standard)? In peridic simulations, you can have diffrcation orders propagating at stepp angles to the PML boundaries, this can impact the performance of the PML. To reduce the effects, we generall recommend using the "steep angle" PML profile.
Regards,
Amrita -
May 22, 2024 at 6:04 amAbha MauryaSubscriber
I am using standard, and along with that, I want to inform you that I am using plane waves with periodic waves at normal incidence.
and also at the top of the structure nanoparticle is there,
any suggestion now??
-
May 25, 2024 at 6:39 pmAbha MauryaSubscriber
what is lambda in the above answer?
-
May 27, 2024 at 4:55 pmAmrita PatiAnsys Employee
Hi Abha,
You can try the "steep" PML profile. Even though you have normal incidence, you could have diffration orders in different directions as it is a periodic geometry. Just to double check, you mention that there is a particle on top of the structure, is the whole geometry (including the particle) periodic? You can use periodic BCs with plane waves only when the geometry is periodic.
lambda is the source wavelength. If you are using a wideband source then the best practice is to use the longest wavelength.
Would you be able to share a screenshot of the geometry? That will help me provide more specific information.
Regards,
Amrita
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
- Ansys Insight:使用Checkpoint继续仿真被迫中断或已经仿真结束的文件
- 怎么修改生成远场图片的横纵坐标以及坐标标签的字体大小
- INTERCONNECT – No results unless rerun simulation until it gives any
- EME得到的S参数与监视器结果不一致的问题
- 如何直观计算3db带宽
- INTERCONNECT – obtain power output over time & check for SNR
- varFDTD半导体激光器建模方向及反射率设置问题
- Inverse Design Freezing Issue
- Calculation of correlation values in laser modulation bandwidth simulation
- Import material .txt file with script
-
421
-
192
-
178
-
162
-
141
© 2024 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.