TAGGED: lsdyna
-
-
November 8, 2024 at 9:31 am373352238Subscriber
I am applying dynamic relaxation in my model, with gravity and axial forces imposed in the first step. Although the relevant parameters are set as required, some nodes still exhibit non-zero velocities at the final stage. Moreover, when restarting the analysis for the second step, I observed a sudden increase in node velocities at the beginning, even before applying the new load. I suspect the dynamic relaxation might not have been effectively applied, and the process is also taking a considerable amount of time. Could you advise on how to optimize the dynamic relaxation method, or suggest alternative approaches?
-
November 12, 2024 at 2:36 pmRaman BabuAnsys Employee
Hello,
As per the dynamic relaxation, it seems like you have losen tolerance issue. So, some dynamic effect may be present. Please tighten the tolerance value and try it. To convergence it faster, you can try damping in the contact (VDC=20) if contacts are present & can also try after adding *DAMPING_PART_STIFFNESS card.
The other appraoches could be like Single, switched analysis( implicit -explicit switching), Implicit DR,etc. The detailed description is given in the below doc.
https://ftp.lstc.com/anonymous/outgoing/jday/bolt_preload3.pdf
Regards,
Raman Babu
Â
Â
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
- Speed up simulation in HFSS
- Workbench license error
- ansys fluent error when opening it “unexpected license problem”
- Unexpected error on Workbench: Root element not found.
- not able to get result
- Unexpected issues with SCCM deployment of Ansys Fluids and Structures 2024 R1
- Unable to recover corrupted project in Workbench
- Questions and recommendations: Septum Horn Antenna
- Unattended (silent) installation of 2024R2 & -productfile switch
- AQWA: Hydrodynamic response error
-
1156
-
478
-
471
-
225
-
201
© 2024 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.