The Ansys Innovation Space website recently experienced a database corruption issue. While service has been restored there appears to have been some data loss from November 13. We are still investigating and apologize for any issues our users may have as a result.
Fluids

Fluids

Topics related to Fluent, CFX, Turbogrid and more.

Converge issue with phase interaction

    • chuminhkhue
      Subscriber
      Hi, everybody.
      I'm doing in ansys fluent 2023R2.
      -  Steady-state for 2D model.
      - Multiphase model: Eulerian.
      - Primary phase material: Newtonian.
      - Second phase material: non-Newtonian.
      -  Scheme: phase coupled simple
      -  Mesh size: 5e-3mm.
      -  Diameter for secondary phase: 8e-3mm.
      -  Momentum is second-order upwind.
      Boundary condition: rectagular (0.1 mm and 20mm ), velocity inlet is 0.5m/s. zero presure at outlet

      My model cannot converge when using Schiller-Naumann model for Drag Coefficient and saffman-mei for Lift Coefficient. If Lift Coefficient and Drag Coefficient are constant, then it can converge with the default criteria.


      I am looking forward help from experts and knowledgeable users
      Thank you so much!!!
    • Rob
      Forum Moderator

      Have a look at the flow field - what's going on? Multiphase models rarely run well in steady state as there are nearly always some transient features in the flow. How are the monitors looking?

    • chuminhkhue
      Subscriber

      Because of some proposals, I am trying to represent it using a steady model.
      Monitor looks like this.

    • Rob
      Forum Moderator

      Point monitors from the report definitions - ie how the flow is behaving in the domain. 

      • chuminhkhue
        Subscriber

        Sorry for my misunderstand your mean.
        Monitors from the report definitions like this.
        1. the pressure for the entire domain.

        2.drag force and lift force on wall.


        3. viscosity in secondary phase.

    • Rob
      Forum Moderator

      No worries. You may find you want single point values in various locations to get a better idea of what is going on. 

      Of the above, the Lift plot looks most diagnostic as the scale is reasonable (you can alter the scale and number type in the plots). That suggests the solution isn't stable, and that something is changing with each iteration. You now need to review more data points, mass reports and a mix of contour & vector plots at intervals to decide if the result is good enough to answer the question the model was built to solve. 

      • chuminhkhue
        Subscriber

         

        1. scaled residuals 


        2. I observe various points along the centerline
        a) at a third

        b) at the center

        c) at two-thirds

        d) static pressure contour

        I have observed. but I can’t achieve convergence be achieved. could you give me some advice for my case?
        thanks and best regards,

         

    • Rob
      Forum Moderator

      Change the scale on the xy plots - there may well be some noise that's being masked by the nonsense values from the first 50-100 iterations. That may well explain what's going on. 

      • chuminhkhue
        Subscriber

         

         

        Thank you for your support. Here is the zoomed graph

        a) at a third

        b) at the center

        c) at two-thirds

        2.drag force and lift force on wall.


         

    • Rob
      Forum Moderator

      So the solution is still changing, and may have some transient features. Run on and see what happens. Also save some contours etc to see if the flow field changes. 

Viewing 6 reply threads
  • The topic ‘Converge issue with phase interaction’ is closed to new replies.