TAGGED: #fluent-#ansys, define_grid_motion, dynamic-mesh, udf
-
-
June 30, 2023 at 9:59 amChristopher PassSubscriber
I am trying to model a case in which one cell zone in my domain will undergo both rigid body motion and deforming motion. I have defined the rigid body motion in a UDF using the DEFINE_CG_MOTION macro, this motion is working fine.Â
I have specified the deforming motion using the DEFINE_GRID_MOTION macro, I had a version of this UDF in which I was defining node positions on the deforming boundary explicitly, this did not work so I have modified this by using the NODE_COORD_NEST macro which I believe should specify the deforming motion relative to the CG motion of the whole zone.
My workflow is to:
- Compile DEFINE_CG_MOTION and DEFINE_GRID_MOTION macros.
- Setup rigid body deformation on relevant cell zones.
- Setup 'user-specified' mesh deformation on deforming boundary.
- Set the user-specified mesh deformation to occur relative the CG motion of the adjacent cell zone.
This seems to be working in that I can clearly see CG motion as specified and I can also see motion of the boundary nodes. The issue is that, despite setting a deforming thread flag (SET_DEFORMING_THREAD_FLAG) to define the adjacent cell zone as deforming, I dont see any deformation of the interior mesh so I get inverted elements immediately.Â
Can anyone offer any advice? I have searched this forum and also dug through the documentation to no avail so any guidance would be appreciated!
Â
-
July 6, 2023 at 11:08 amC NAnsys Employee
Hello christopher,
You have raised a SR and I am working on it. As discussed , It is most probably the udf not working properly . Kindly check on it. I will update you regarding this on the service requestal portal
Thanks,
Chaitanya Natraj
-
- The topic ‘Combining CG Motion and Grid Motion Macros in Fluent’ is closed to new replies.
-
421
-
192
-
178
-
162
-
140
© 2024 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.