Ansys Assistant will be unavailable on the Learning Forum starting January 30. An upgraded version is coming soon. We apologize for any inconvenience and appreciate your patience. Stay tuned for updates.
Fluids

Fluids

Topics related to Fluent, CFX, Turbogrid and more.

CHT Meshing for TPMS: Boundary Layer Failures & Boolean Subtract Workflow

    • epagenkopf
      Subscriber

      I am currently working on Conjugate Heat Transfer (CHT) simulations for a Triply Periodic Minimal Surface (TPMS) heat exchanger. While I've had great success with purely hydraulic (fluid-only) simulations, I am running into significant roadblocks when attempting to mesh both the solid and fluid domains simultaneously in Ansys Fluent.

      What I've tried:

      Simultaneous Meshing & Mesh Interfaces: My current method is to import and mesh both the solid and fluid domains together in Fluent Meshing, and then create a mesh interface in the solver to align them as best as possible.

      The main issue is that this workflow severely restricts my boundary layers. If I attempt to generate more than 1 boundary layer, the volume mesh typically fails. This is not ideal for capturing the near-wall physics in these tight, complex lattice channels, which is likely hurting the accuracy of my results. When I was running single-domain hydraulic simulations, I had no limitations on boundary layer generation.

      Questions:

      Boolean/Subtract Workflows in Fluent: A national lab I collaborate with uses Star-CCM+, which allows them to import just one domain (e.g., the solid) and then generate the fluid domain via a Boolean subtract operation. Does Fluent Meshing have a similar Boolean, wrapping, or volume-extraction workflow that would make generating high-quality meshes on these TPMS structures easier?

      Boundary Layer Generation: Has anyone found a reliable way to successfully grow multiple boundary layers on complex TPMS walls in a CHT setup without the volume mesh failing?

      General TPMS Meshing Advice: Are there specific workflows (such as Watertight Geometry vs. Fault-Tolerant Meshing) or best practices for importing and meshing highly complex TPMS structures for multiphysics in Fluent? Any advice on a robust nTop-to-Fluent pipeline for CHT would be greatly appreciated. I've been following an nTop guide that uses fault-tolerant meshing workflow linked here: https://support.ntop.com/hc/en-us/articles/19341018332435-How-to-export-your-design-to-Ansys-Fluent.

      Software Versions:

      Ansys Fluent 2023 R2 

      nTop 5.41.3

Viewing 0 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
[bingo_chatbox]