We have an exciting announcement about badges coming in May 2025. Until then, we will temporarily stop issuing new badges for course completions and certifications. However, all completions will be recorded and fulfilled after May 2025.
Photonics

Photonics

Topics related to Lumerical and more.

Choosing “auto shutoff min”

    • kim.bui
      Subscriber

      Hi all,

      I am simulating resonator structures with periodic boundary conditions (and normal source incident angle) in FDTD where I have increased the simulation time such that the standard autoshutoff level of 1e-5 is reached.

      However, for some resonators, the transmission result still has "ripples". Following the instructions on Transmission Results Greater Than One – Ansys Optics, I have set the PML boundaries to "steep angle" instead of "standard". But the ripples are still there:

      When I decrease the "auto shutoff min" to 1e-6 the ripples of the result above are gone:

      In Auto-shutoff level (ansys.com), it was stated that the default threshold level of 1e-5 is low enough for most simulations, but is there a way to determine what the necessary threshold is?

      Kind regards,

      Kim

       

    • Amrita Pati
      Ansys Employee

      Hi Kim,

      That is true, an auto shutoff min of 1e-05 works for most cases, but typically for resonators we have seen that you might need lower values (1e-06, 1e-07). Unfortunately, there is no way to predict that. How the energy decays over the simulation time is very spefic to the geometry and the source conditions, and requires a bit of trial and error to get to the right value.

      Regards,
      Amrita

Viewing 1 reply thread
  • The topic ‘Choosing “auto shutoff min”’ is closed to new replies.