Ansys Assistant will be unavailable on the Learning Forum starting January 30. An upgraded version is coming soon. We apologize for any inconvenience and appreciate your patience. Stay tuned for updates.
General Mechanical

General Mechanical

Topics related to Mechanical Enterprise, Motion, Additive Print and more.

Choose iterative Solver type PCG because of insufficient RAM for direct solver with Sparse matrix

    • Johnson
      Subscriber

      Hi all,


      the solver for my project (1Mio DOFs) is using the direct Sparse Matrix solver. But I have limited RAM and he is always going into out-core memory mode regarding to the solution output.


      Therefore I changed the Solver type to iterative and put the EQSLV, PCG command under the Static Structural branch.


      But the Programm is still choosing the direct solver running into the same problem.


      BCSOPT,,INCORE does not change anything either...


      Why is my change being ignored?


      Would very much appreciate your help!



    • peteroznewman
      Subscriber

      You have something in your model that is not supported by the PCG solver.  If you scan your Solve.out file, it will give you more detail about what that is. I can't recall exactly but maybe Joints?

    • Johnson
      Subscriber

      Thanks!


      I found something. Its says:


       The preconditioned conjugate gradient solver (EQSLV,PCG command) is    
       only available for single-field thermal analyses with unsymmetric      
       matrices.  The solver has been reset to SPARSE.     


      I am doing a static structural analysis. Can I still use a iterative solver?


      Unfortunately I do not habe enough RAM to use SPARSE.

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • The topic ‘Choose iterative Solver type PCG because of insufficient RAM for direct solver with Sparse matrix’ is closed to new replies.
[bingo_chatbox]