-
-
November 27, 2023 at 4:02 am
-
November 28, 2023 at 8:39 amZheng ZhouAnsys Employee
您好,这里有一个问题就是 2D 仿真里面最后的电流是使用的 2D 浓度分布乘以这个 norm length 的结果,可以理解成是这个 2D 结果平移增厚的结果。但是 3D 仿真是直接在 3D 做网格划分计算,因此两个结果有差异是合理的,如果想要尝试减小这个差异,首先要确保模型在第三个维度是均匀的,其次需要网格划分足够精细,即收敛性测试。
另外提醒一下中文贴请发到对应中文分区:/forum/forums/forum/discuss-simulation/photonics-chinese/
-
December 9, 2023 at 7:02 amMing liSubscriber
你好,我们做的方向相似不知道能不能交流一下,2747439044
-
Viewing 2 reply threads
- The topic ‘charge 3D和2D仿真结果不一样’ is closed to new replies.
Ansys Innovation Space
Trending discussions
- INTERCONNECT – No results unless rerun simulation until it gives any
- Errors Running Ring Modulator Example on Cluster
- Import material .txt file with script
- Difference between answers in version 2024 and 2017 lumerical mode solution
- Calculation of correlation values in laser modulation bandwidth simulation
- Trapezoidal ring
Top Contributors
-
1116
-
468
-
440
-
225
-
201
Top Rated Tags
© 2024 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.