The Ansys Innovation Space website recently experienced a database corruption issue. While service has been restored there appears to have been some data loss from November 13. We are still investigating and apologize for any issues our users may have as a result.
LS Dyna

LS Dyna

Topics related to LS-DYNA, Autodyn, Explicit STR and more.

CESE Chemistry solver fails in 2D Axisymmetric case

    • s.machadomartins
      Subscriber

      Hello, I'm trying to set up a simple 2D axisymmetric simulation using the compressible CESE Chemistry (inviscid). I defined an H2-O2 reaction mechanism with 8 reactions and gave the thermodynamic input file.

      Background:
      The simulation domain is a rectangle with solid walls and an ignition zone with high pressure and temperature. When I use a 2D planar simulation (igeom=2), a shock wave develops and propagates in the H2-O2 mixture. The temperature, pressure and speed of the shock wave closely match the theoretical CJ values for hydrogen detonation, so I assume the simulation is correct (see the image below). 

      Problem: 
      However, when I switch to the 2D Axissymetric simulation the simulation doesn't converge and weird/non-physical values show up in the results. Instead of a uniform propagation of the shock wave, I get random spots with non-sense values (even away from the ignition point), as shown below. The only difference to the 2D planar simulation is that I define the *CESE_BOUNDARY_AXISYMMETRIC in the y-axis and change the *CESE_CONTROL_SOLVER card to perform a 2D axisymetric simulation (igeom=101). 


      The error message is:
       *** Error 150209 (CHEM+209)
           Chemistry EOS nonlinear temperature solver failed to converge.
           Error code = 50 Last iterate temperature = -0.21165E+04

      I tried to simplify the problem by reducing the reaction mechanism and removing the ignition but the problem persists. Additionally, I reduced the mesh size and the time step and still doesn't converge. However, if I run the CESE axisymmetric simulation without the chemistry cards the results are okay.

      Has anyone faced similar problems or has any idea on how to approach these issues?? 
      I need to set up the axisymmetric case since my next step is to run a simulation of a cylinder with bigger dimensions. 

    • Ushnish Basu
      Ansys Employee

      We have fixed several bugs recently regarding the chemically-reacting flow solver, especially as affecting the 2D-axisymmetric case.

      Please try out a recent Dev version or an updated R15 version. You will have to contact your Ansys account representative to get access to these version.

    • DENG
      Subscriber
      Hello,I have recently been trying to use compressible CESE to compute the H2-O2 reaction. However, the shock wave's temperature, pressure, and velocity I obtained differ significantly from the theoretical CJ values for hydrogen explosion. Would you be able to share the K file and the thermodynamic input files? Do the final shock wave's temperature, pressure, and velocity depend on the thermodynamic input files? My email address is 1779414982@qq.com. I look forward to your reply!
    • DENG
      Subscriber
      Hello, may I ask if your model was downloaded from a website? Could you share it, please?
    • s.machadomartins
      Subscriber

      Hello, most of the thermodynamic files I tried were able to capture the CJ values correctly, as long as there are no errors in the input file. The SDToolbox developed by Caltech has a good collection of H2-O2 reactions models and thermodynamic inputs for detonation simulations (https://shepherd.caltech.edu/EDL/PublicResources/sdt/). Are you using a long enough domain to let the detonation build-up? There's always an acceleration phase after ignition for which the temperature and pressure are below the CJ values. Also, the ignition is important, a weak ignition may cause a deflagration instead of a detonation, which will differ from the CJ values. Usually, an ignition with a high pressure (1.5-2 MPa) followed by a high-temperature zone (2000-3000K) is enough. 

      I couldn't find any models using chemistry in LS-DYNA examples, only CESE models without chemistry. But I'll send you my Shock Tube problem by email. Note that this model is 2D-axisymmetric and it doesn't converge for versions below the R15 development version, where they fixed some robustness bugs.

    • Atish Gawale
      Subscriber

      Hello,

      Were you able to use MPP Double precision solver?. I get non physical results with MPP_D. 

      Regards,

      Atish

    • s.machadomartins
      Subscriber

      Hi Atish,

      Yes, I'm using mpp_d_R15 version for linux and mpirun. I had some problems with R14 version, but R15 works fine.

      Regards,

      Simão

Viewing 6 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.