TAGGED: fdtd
-
-
September 5, 2024 at 3:17 am
yuqizhu
SubscriberI noticed that the auto shutoff level in job manager is oscillating towards the end of the run, e.g. between 1.7e-5 and 1.2e-5. In my experience with other simulations, this number just decreases monotonically to the set auto shutoff trigger level1e-5. I wander if this is indicative of some sort of numerical error.Â
Is this a problem? if so, any advice on how to fix this? thanks in advance
-
September 6, 2024 at 2:21 am
Ethan Keeler
Ansys EmployeeHello, thanks for your question!
This doesn't necessarily imply that there is a numerical error in your simulation. Often when we see an oscillation in the auto-shutoff value, it might mean that there are some resonances arising in your simulation and it can take a longer time for the energy to sufficiently decay to the auto-shutoff level.
There are a few things you can consider:
- You can check your boundary conditions. If they are PML, then you will want to double check that you are not getting any non-physical reflections from the simulation boundary.
- You could slightly increase the auto-shutoff from its default value. The oscillations are very near the default level so I don't expect it will have a huge impact on the results, but if the simulation is terminated too early you may see some non-physical ripples in the spectrum.
Ethan
-
September 10, 2024 at 10:57 pm
yuqizhu
SubscriberHi Ethan,
thanks for your reply. I do have mutiple PMLs. I tried to put a time monitor near a boundary and monitor the poynting vector. I suppose non physical reflections should be seen here? what level of oscillation would be considered as due to PML reflections?Â
Yuqi
-
September 11, 2024 at 5:33 pm
yuqizhu
SubscriberI seem to have trouble uploading images directly... but attached are some time monitors near PMLs in my google drive. In this simulation, auto shuoff was not triggered
Â
-
September 23, 2024 at 4:13 pm
Ethan Keeler
Ansys EmployeeHi Yuqi,
Apologies for the delay! It's hard to say exactly what level of power could be contributed by the PML reflections. You could also try understanding what's happening near the PML boundary by placing a point time monitor nearby to see if the fields are circulating for some time.
If you are finding reflections or want to do a bit of convergence testing, I was thinking you could try increasing the number of PML layers to see if that impacts the resonating energy. You can read more about parameter selection for the PML boundaries here: PML boundary conditions in FDTD and MODE – Ansys Optics.
Ethan
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
- Import material .txt file with script
- Errors Running Ring Modulator Example on Cluster
- Absorption cross-section of AuNR excited by prism-based TIR
- How to measure transmission coefficients on a given plane .
- TE Polarization Fraction + Waveguide TE/TM Fraction
- Edge Coupler EME Example Issue
- Lumerical Python API Topology Optimization Error 2025 R1
- 2D inverse design grating coupler
- FDE : Simulation waveguides with electrodes
- Loss of lithium niobate phase modulator
-
2262
-
925
-
599
-
591
-
497
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.