-
-
September 14, 2022 at 10:40 am2212296Subscriber
Hi, I am running a simulation on transmission coefficient (s-parameters) in the wavelength range of 1-10um.
There are two scan modes: single point scan and point scan within range
Single point scan: set the light source at a certain value between 1-10um
Range scanning: the starting wavelength of the light source is 1um, and the ending wavelength is 10um, taking a certain frequency point
In theory, the result should be the same. However, there is a big difference (redshift or blueshift) Question: Can you better fit the curves of the two?
There is nothing happier to me than to receive your letter
-
September 14, 2022 at 7:56 pmGuilin SunAnsys Employee
May I know what solver you are referring? FDTD or EME? If it is FDTD, please make sure that you specify the source in wavelength, not in frequency.
For FDTD, since the material fitting (if it is dispersive ) and mesh genration will depend on the wavelength, it is better to fix both of them. You can try this:
-
September 15, 2022 at 1:56 am
-
-
September 14, 2022 at 8:17 pmGuilin SunAnsys Employee
One thing I forgot to mention: when you sweep wavelength, please sweep both the “wavelength start” and the “wavelength stop” in order to have a single wavelength result.
I did a simple test and ensured that both methods give exacly the same result, provided that you have set up the wavelength stop the same as the wavelength start.
-
September 15, 2022 at 12:42 am2212296Subscriber
Hello, because the wavelength is 1-10um, the simulation time is too long, so I use 5-10um (frequency 30-60Thz).
Transmission Spectrum (T = transmission('T'))
- Scanning: 5-10(um) 61point
- Single point: 5:(5/60):10(um) Introduce for loop
-
September 15, 2022 at 12:51 am
-
September 15, 2022 at 1:40 am
-
-
September 15, 2022 at 1:17 amGuilin SunAnsys Employee
You are sweeping single wavelength but the start and stop wavelengths are not the same, which is wrong!
In most cases you do not need to sweep the wavelength. Instead, you need to use Boradband for mode source here:
You can read out the wavelength and see if they are the same. I am sure if you set correctly the result will be the same.
-
September 15, 2022 at 1:43 am2212296Subscriber
Hello, the first two replies are two different solutions
-
September 15, 2022 at 1:45 am2212296Subscriber
Please read my reply completely, thank you!!
-
-
September 15, 2022 at 8:39 pmGuilin SunAnsys Employee
You mentioned “point” sweep and “range” sweep”, and I provided solutions. Not only I tested the “range” sweep and “point” sweep, I also tested script loop one wavelength at a time by setting the wavelength “start” and “stop” the same. No any discrepancy among the 3 methods is found. If you found difference, please upgrad to the newest version 2022R2.2.
Please use the sweep utility.
If you have other questions please write a new post, please.
-
September 16, 2022 at 12:56 am
-
-
September 20, 2022 at 12:22 am
-
- The topic ‘About point and range scans’ is closed to new replies.
- INTERCONNECT – No results unless rerun simulation until it gives any
- Errors Running Ring Modulator Example on Cluster
- Difference between answers in version 2024 and 2017 lumerical mode solution
- Import material .txt file with script
- Calculation of correlation values in laser modulation bandwidth simulation
- Trapezoidal ring
- Help for qINTERCONNECT
- Issues with getting result from interconnent analysis script
- Topology Optimization Error
- Edge Coupler EME Example Issue
-
1131
-
468
-
466
-
225
-
201
© 2024 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.