-
-
September 14, 2022 at 10:40 am
2212296
SubscriberHi, I am running a simulation on transmission coefficient (s-parameters) in the wavelength range of 1-10um.
There are two scan modes: single point scan and point scan within range
Single point scan: set the light source at a certain value between 1-10um
Range scanning: the starting wavelength of the light source is 1um, and the ending wavelength is 10um, taking a certain frequency point
In theory, the result should be the same. However, there is a big difference (redshift or blueshift) Question: Can you better fit the curves of the two?
There is nothing happier to me than to receive your letter
-
September 14, 2022 at 7:56 pm
Guilin Sun
Ansys EmployeeMay I know what solver you are referring? FDTD or EME? If it is FDTD, please make sure that you specify the source in wavelength, not in frequency.
For FDTD, since the material fitting (if it is dispersive ) and mesh genration will depend on the wavelength, it is better to fix both of them. You can try this:
-
September 15, 2022 at 1:56 am
-
-
September 14, 2022 at 8:17 pm
Guilin Sun
Ansys EmployeeOne thing I forgot to mention: when you sweep wavelength, please sweep both the “wavelength start” and the “wavelength stop” in order to have a single wavelength result.
I did a simple test and ensured that both methods give exacly the same result, provided that you have set up the wavelength stop the same as the wavelength start.
-
September 15, 2022 at 12:42 am
2212296
SubscriberHello, because the wavelength is 1-10um, the simulation time is too long, so I use 5-10um (frequency 30-60Thz).
Transmission Spectrum (T = transmission('T'))
- Scanning: 5-10(um) 61point
- Single point: 5:(5/60):10(um) Introduce for loop
-
September 15, 2022 at 12:51 am
-
September 15, 2022 at 1:40 am
-
-
September 15, 2022 at 1:17 am
Guilin Sun
Ansys EmployeeYou are sweeping single wavelength but the start and stop wavelengths are not the same, which is wrong!
In most cases you do not need to sweep the wavelength. Instead, you need to use Boradband for mode source here:
You can read out the wavelength and see if they are the same. I am sure if you set correctly the result will be the same.
-
September 15, 2022 at 1:43 am
2212296
SubscriberHello, the first two replies are two different solutions
-
September 15, 2022 at 1:45 am
2212296
SubscriberPlease read my reply completely, thank you!!
-
-
September 15, 2022 at 8:39 pm
Guilin Sun
Ansys EmployeeYou mentioned “point” sweep and “range” sweep”, and I provided solutions. Not only I tested the “range” sweep and “point” sweep, I also tested script loop one wavelength at a time by setting the wavelength “start” and “stop” the same. No any discrepancy among the 3 methods is found. If you found difference, please upgrad to the newest version 2022R2.2.
Please use the sweep utility.
If you have other questions please write a new post, please.
-
September 16, 2022 at 12:56 am
-
-
September 20, 2022 at 12:22 am
-
- The topic ‘About point and range scans’ is closed to new replies.
- Import material .txt file with script
- Errors Running Ring Modulator Example on Cluster
- Absorption cross-section of AuNR excited by prism-based TIR
- How to measure transmission coefficients on a given plane .
- TE Polarization Fraction + Waveguide TE/TM Fraction
- Edge Coupler EME Example Issue
- Lumerical Python API Topology Optimization Error 2025 R1
- 2D inverse design grating coupler
- FDE : Simulation waveguides with electrodes
- Loss of lithium niobate phase modulator
-
2262
-
925
-
599
-
591
-
497
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.