TAGGED: 3d, fluent, overset-mesh
-
-
October 12, 2020 at 8:44 pm
mese
SubscriberI have a 3D Fluent model where a disc (with a partly cogged surface) is rotating into a fluid medium. The disc diameter is 80 mm and its length is 0.25 mm. The depth of the background mesh is equal to the length of the disc (the disc fits into the background mesh).
The model consists of a background mesh (figures 1) and a component mesh (figures 2). The component mesh is a ring of fluid around the disc. I have considered a cylindrical hole in the middle of the background. The hole and disc are concentric and the diameter of the hole is somewhat smaller than the disc so that a layer of mesh will exist between the surfaces of the hole and disc (figure 3). I expected that after initialization, only this layer of mesh becomes “dead” and is removed from the solution domain.
October 14, 2020 at 1:32 pmKonstantin
Ansys EmployeeI assume the case has been initialized, otherwise the overset mesh cannot be displayed. I assume also that there is no orphans, or the number of orphans are small. This is a 3d case, no surface has been selected in the display Mesh panel. Use boundary distance donor priority method. Gaps are small, make sure to use double precision solver.nOctober 14, 2020 at 11:10 pmmese
SubscriberThank you. Yes, the displayed results are after initialization. Please note that in Figure 4, I have not shown the selected surfaces. In fact, for illustrations, I have selected all items in the surfaces list. nThe model is with double precision. I used boundary distance donor priority method but still the background mesh is not visible. nLet’s have a look to the orphan cells. There are 170292 overset orphan cells in the overset interface and that is the same with both donor priority methods.nFigure 5 (below) shows orphan cells by the command define/overset-interfaces/mark-cells then writing orphan then the command define/overset-interface/display-cells. The figure is the same with both donor priority methods. We see that a row of orphan cells is formed in the outer layer of the component mesh. Sounds interesting. n
nFigure 5. A zoomed-in view showing orphan cells in red colour.nI guess the background mesh is actually removed by the solver and I think the reason is related to the fact that a physical boundary of the background is surrounded by a wall of the component mesh (see figure 3), which as a result, a physical boundary is forced to remove. If that is the case (?) I do not know based on which rule Fluent makes this decision.n
Viewing 2 reply threads- The topic ‘Why the background mesh is removed? (Fluent, Overset, 3D)’ is closed to new replies.
Innovation SpaceTrending discussions- air flow in and out of computer case
- Varying Bond model parameters to mimic soil particle cohesion/stiction
- Eroded Mass due to Erosion of Soil Particles by Fluids
- I am doing a corona simulation. But particles are not spreading.
- Centrifugal Fan Analysis for Determination of Characteristic Curve
- Guidance needed for Conjugate Heat Transfer Analysis for a 3s3p Li-ion Battery
- Issue to compile a UDF in ANSYS Fluent
- JACOBI Convergence Issue in ANSYS AQWA
- affinity not set
- Resuming SAG Mill Simulation with New Particle Batch in Rocky
Top Contributors-
4167
-
1487
-
1338
-
1188
-
1021
Top Rated Tags© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ansys does not support the usage of unauthorized Ansys software. Please visit www.ansys.com to obtain an official distribution.
-
