TAGGED: -CFD-DEM, #fluent, rocky-dem, two-way-coupling
-
-
August 23, 2026 at 12:26 pm
延超 孙
Bbp_participantHello,
I am using Ansys Rocky 2026 R1 Academic Student together with Fluent 2026 R1.
The unmodified Tutorial 14 restart project can establish two-way Rocky–Fluent coupling and exchange CFD/DEM data on this computer. However, when I try to create a new 2-Way Fluent node for a custom project, Rocky’s automatic validation fails with:
Coupling errors:
No mesh_info.json file was found.Coupling warnings:
Current Fluent build id 10262 may not be compatible with Rocky-Fluent compiled UDFs with build id 10261.What I have checked:
-
The Fluent CAS file uses a fully ASCII path.
-
The CAS contains 72,970 fluid cells.
-
The same CAS can be opened independently in Fluent.
-
Using the Rocky-supplied UDF mesh-check functions in Fluent gives rocky/is_mesh_valid = #t and successfully generates mesh_info.json.
-
Rocky’s Options > Ansys > Install Fluent/Rocky export command completes successfully, but the warning remains.
-
After the automatic validation fails, Rocky does not create the 2-Way Fluent node.
I am not certain whether the build-number difference is the actual cause or only a warning. Could Ansys please help confirm:
-
What should be checked when a new 2-Way Fluent node reports “No mesh_info.json” even though the CAS mesh passes the Rocky UDF mesh validation?
-
Is there an official update or supported repair procedure for the Fluent/Rocky integration files in Ansys Student 2026 R1?
-
Why can the existing Tutorial 14 restart coupling run, while validation for a newly created coupling node fails?
I have not modified the official Scheme scripts, compiled UDFs, mesh_info.json, or validation cache.
Thank you.
-
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
-
6880
-
1906
-
1544
-
1344
-
1217
© 2026 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.