Fluids

Fluids

Topics related to Fluent, CFX, Turbogrid and more.

MHD-DPM coupling

    • ntrippella
      Subscriber

      Hi,

      I was trying to simulate the effect of a permanent magnet (a mangetic candle) on small solid ferromagentic paerticle in a water solution. 

      In particular, particles are supposed to rotate around the magnet (this is how the device works). 

      I have designed a simple magnetic candle in Ansys Maxwell. I have imported its B field inside fluent. You can see it on this figure:

      (the white rectangle is where the magnete is supposed to be placed) 

       

      Then I have activated the DPM and the MHD module.

      The simulation converges.

      However, the particles seems not to be affected by the magentic field. I tried changing their diameters, from 1e-6 to 1e-4 but nothing changes.

      Even though I amplify it in the MHD module by a factor of 10, it seems to have zero effects on the particles trajectories. 

      What do you think? I am doing something wrong on the simulation or the magnet is too weak? The weired thing is that even with a 10 factor amplification, i obtain the same results. 

    • Rob
      Forum Moderator

      Did you turn on anything in Fluent to tell the DPM particles about the magnetic field?

    • ntrippella
      Subscriber

      Hi, Rob. Thank you for your prompt reply. 

      This is what I have in the DPM panel:

      The source and the body force are activated from the MHD module 

       

       

       

       

    • Rob
      Forum Moderator

      I assume the particles have a charge? Does anything change if you switch to transient particles? I'll need to check this side if we have anything we can share.  

    • ntrippella
      Subscriber

      I have not tried with transient simulation. Do you think something could change? 

      Particles are ferromagnetic particles with zero electric charge. I have tried stressing their permeability to 100 but it does not worked.

      I could share my .cas file, could you please give me your email and I will send to you with we transfer if you have time

       

    • Rob
      Forum Moderator

      We're not permitted to download or receive files due to the Forum being "public". Commercial users with paid support can also raise tickets to do what you propose. 

      I was wondering if transient tracking was needed as there's no reason for a particle to move once it arrives at the high/low/neutral charge point. So transient might at least show movement, albeit, not necessarily where you wanted it. 

    • ntrippella
      Subscriber

      I could try with transient simulation. However, now I was trying simulating greater particles (D form 1e-6 to 1e-5), to see whetere there could be changes. 

    • Rob
      Forum Moderator

      Possibly. As particles become smaller the drag effects may outweigh other body forces. But you tried 1e-4m already?

    • Ulrich
      Ansys Employee

      Make sure that you have activated "Include Lorentz Force" and that you have set a Charge Density other than zero.

    • ntrippella
      Subscriber

      Yes, I have activated the Include Lorentz Forca option. 

      However, I have set the charge value equal to 0. Why do you think I have to chnage it to -500?

      The small particles are ferromagnetic particles. I think they are not electrically charged. They represent the small dirt that can be present inside water in water hydraulic systems.

    • Ulrich
      Ansys Employee

      "-500" was just an arbitrary number.

      If you look at the equation for the Lorentz force acting on the particle (see eq. (21-27) in te R 2024 R2 Fluent Theory Guide) you see that the force is zero without a charge.

    • ntrippella
      Subscriber

      Yes. Indeed the force for the particle should be the magnetic force associated to their permability which is different from the lorentz force, i suppose.

Viewing 11 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.