-
-
July 29, 2024 at 7:23 amMS10Subscriber
I am working on a CFD simulation for CO2 capture using K2CO3 adsorbent in a 2D bubbling fluidized bed. Here are the details of my simulation:
- Using Eulerian CFD with the Gidaspow Drag model (Transient simulation).
- Modeling species transport with reaction.
- The reaction is: CO2 + H2O + K2CO3 --> 2KHCO3.
My questions are:
1. I modeled this as a heterogeneous reaction in multiphase modeling. Is this correct?
2. I didn't use a volumetric reaction. Is this okay?
3. I made a solid mixture of K2CO3 and KHCO3 to define KHCO3 as the product. Is this the right approach?
4. My simulation is diverging as soon as it starts. I've tried changing the model settings, but it didn't help.
5. I'm not sure how to correctly model this reaction.Thank youÂ
Error:ÂDivergence detected in AMG solver: vof-1
Divergence detected in AMG solver: pressure correction
Divergence detected in AMG solver: gas-phase-species-0
Divergence detected in AMG solver: gas-phase-species-1
Divergence detected in AMG solver: solid-phase-species-0
Divergence detected in AMG solver: vof-1
Divergence detected in AMG solver: pressure correction
Divergence detected in AMG solver: gas-phase-species-0
Divergence detected in AMG solver: gas-phase-species-1
Divergence detected in AMG solver: solid-phase-species-0
Divergence detected in AMG solver: vof-1
Divergence detected in AMG solver: pressure correction
Divergence detected in AMG solver: gas-phase-species-0
Divergence detected in AMG solver: gas-phase-species-1
Divergence detected in AMG solver: solid-phase-species-0
Divergence detected in AMG solver: vof-1
Error at host: floating point exception
Â
Error: floating point exception
-
July 29, 2024 at 2:19 pmRobForum Moderator
What you propose looks fairly sensible, but check your assumptions re reaction rates etc. You may also need to account for phase change in the material formation enthalpy.Â
Assuming the mesh is good. Divergence typically means something is changing too quickly. So, check time step. If that fails turn models off until it works. Then turn things back on. That will pinpoint what's causing the problem to help figure out what is needed to fix it.Â
-
August 1, 2024 at 8:49 amMS10Subscriber
Thank you for your response, Bob. The mesh appears to be fine, and I've verified the time step and under-relaxation factors, but nothing seems to work. When I turn off the model, it runs, but I still can't identify the issue. I've checked the model settings and the reaction modeling, but the problem persists. Another thing! I used the same settings to run the simulation on another computer, and it worked fine there. However, the simulation starts well sometimes, but the solid region becomes too fluidized and rises to the top of the reactor, which is unrealistic. What could be causing this issue with the simulation? How can it be corrected? What are the possible solutions to these issues?Â
-
August 1, 2024 at 2:58 pmRobForum Moderator
Looking at the chemistry, you're dropping two moles of gas and adding one mole of solid? What's controlling the reaction rate? That may explain the bed behaviour if material is switching phase too quickly.Â
-
- The topic ‘gas-solid Eulerian with heterogenous reaction’ is closed to new replies.
- Non-Intersected faces found for matching interface periodic-walls
- Unburnt Hydrocarbons contour in ANSYS FORTE for sector mesh
- Help: About the expression of turbulent viscosity in Realizable k-e model
- Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM
- error udf
- Script error Code: 800a000d
- Fluent fails with Intel MPI protocol on 2 nodes
- Diesel with Ammonia/Hydrogen blend combustion
- Mass Conservation Issue in Methane Pyrolysis Shock Tube Simulation
- Encountering Error in Heterogeneous Surface Reaction
-
1191
-
513
-
488
-
225
-
209
© 2024 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.