-
-
July 10, 2024 at 6:58 pmpuh69Subscriber
Hello,
I notice a massive spike in my pressure derivatives close to the wall in my airfoil simulation and am looking for some direction to remove them. I believe this is unphysical and for the work I want to do from here, I need this to be accurate. My goal is to write a UDS where the pressure gradient is a source term and it'll have many issues near the wall if I employ the UDS with the current state of the flow solution.
Thanks!
-
July 11, 2024 at 8:49 amRobForum Moderator
Can you show contours in that region, node values off. Is the above spike the cell or facet value?
-
July 11, 2024 at 3:36 pmpuh69Subscriber
Hi Rob,Â
This is not a single value problem but occurs at many cells close to the wall and I've observed these artifiical gradients on various simulations. Attached is the contour in the region along with a closer look at the dp/dx behavior in those final cells. I've attached plora od both cell and nodal values. Please note values are slightly different as I continue to work on this issue to find a solution but the problem remains regardless of the numerical approach.
Â
Â
-
July 11, 2024 at 4:21 pmRobForum Moderator
Are you running single or double precision? How thick are those cells?
-
July 11, 2024 at 4:46 pmpuh69Subscriber
DP always.
Using TMR 0012 1793x513 grid which states minimum spacing at the wall of y=4 x 10-7
-
July 12, 2024 at 9:27 amRobForum Moderator
Look very carefully at the near wall values. At that scale you may find the cell height (dx) to be so small that the gradient is d(big number)/d(near enough zero) to give some noise. The solver gradients will be fine, it's the reporting I'd be checking.Â
-
July 12, 2024 at 1:13 pmpuh69Subscriber
Rob, I want to use the dp/dx and dp/dy terms as source terms in a UDS and when I do so these errors are significantly magnified. I understand that the margin of error increases with the reduction in the dx factor, but its also present in the dp/dy component too.
Â
Cheers,
Â
Pierce
-
July 12, 2024 at 2:13 pmRobForum Moderator
You need to zoom in so we can see what's happening.Â
-
July 12, 2024 at 3:14 pm
-
July 15, 2024 at 9:05 amRobForum Moderator
And now the pressure & contours?Â
-
July 18, 2024 at 7:51 pmpuh69Subscriber
Hi Rob,Â
These look fine, but the devil is in the detail. If I put the dp/dx term as a source term of a UDS the value in the BL will blow up!
Â
-
July 19, 2024 at 10:13 amRobForum Moderator
As I can't see the contours it's very hard to comment. Please plot with node values off and post here.Â
-
July 19, 2024 at 1:21 pm
-
July 19, 2024 at 3:01 pmRobForum Moderator
Odd, how many cells are there in the unstable region? You may need to alter the colour map scale to improve clarity.Â
-
- The topic ‘Near Wall Pressure Gradients’ is closed to new replies.
- Non-Intersected faces found for matching interface periodic-walls
- Unburnt Hydrocarbons contour in ANSYS FORTE for sector mesh
- Help: About the expression of turbulent viscosity in Realizable k-e model
- Script error Code: 800a000d
- Cyclone (Stairmand) simulation using RSM
- Fluent fails with Intel MPI protocol on 2 nodes
- error udf
- Diesel with Ammonia/Hydrogen blend combustion
- Mass Conservation Issue in Methane Pyrolysis Shock Tube Simulation
- Script Error
-
1236
-
543
-
523
-
225
-
209
© 2024 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.