-
-
July 9, 2024 at 7:01 ammijanurSubscriber
Respected sir,
We are trying to find out the bending loss using both Lummerical FDE and FEEM. (1). How can we compare these two results?
(2). Is there any reference to cross check the results of FDE Or FEEM bending loss for a particular waveguide dimension? if yes please provide to us. Because changing the simulation region we are getting different results.(3). How can we believe our results? Its urgent.
Regards
Mijan
IIT Kharagpur,721302, India
-
July 9, 2024 at 6:22 pmGuilin SunAnsys Employee
If the loss is small, it will be sensitive.
You may need to do converge test with fixed mesh size, not the fixed mesh points in FDE. In FEEM you may need to use higher polynominal orders, or finer edge length, or both. Since the two solvers use very different meshing techniques, it is understandable that if the mesh is not fine enough and the simulation region is not large enough, there are some discrapancy, in particular the small loss. In addition, make sure the material data is exactly the same.
Â
-
- The topic ‘Waveguide bending Loss using Lumerical FDE and FEEM’ is closed to new replies.
- Difference between answers in version 2024 and 2017 lumerical mode solution
- Errors Running Ring Modulator Example on Cluster
- INTERCONNECT – No results unless rerun simulation until it gives any
- Import material .txt file with script
- Help for qINTERCONNECT
- Trapezoidal ring
- Issues with getting result from interconnent analysis script
- How to measure transmission coefficients on a given plane .
- Topology Optimization Error
- Absorption cross-section of AuNR excited by prism-based TIR
-
1301
-
591
-
544
-
524
-
366
© 2025 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.